User talk:DrHenley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hi DrHenley, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

  • Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
  • Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

How you can help:

Additional tips...

  • Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The Image:Signature_icon.png button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
  • If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
Roleplayer Good luck, and have fun. --Roleplayer (talk) 17:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Expelled

This is my final warning. The next time you reverse a deletion of material on a Talk Page that does not pertain directly to improvement of the article, or post such material, I will not only revert that edit, but I will block you. Nightscream (talk) 04:50, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Nightscream, I have not knowingly reversed any edits. And I challenge you to show me anything I have said that is anywhere close to being as inflammatory or irrelevant as this comment:

The Christian Taliban of the US would prefer that their religious magic be the method of choice for determining anything in the natural world. But of course, that means medicine has to go away, because it relies on science, not magic. So, all the good medicine will be in Europe and Asia, and the Christian Taliban will die of diseases, because their magic incantations to a mythical belief set isn't going to work. Then, of course, basic physics and chemistry, which also rely upon the scientific method, will go away, and we will be come a backwater country. Isn't that what the other Taliban did in Afghanistan? Well, I won't live here amongst the Christian Taliban, along with every other intelligent and rational American. Canada, here we come. Of course, with Global Warming, denied by the Christian Taliban, will give us a lot of good land in Canada.  :) OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 14:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

And that comment still stands... DrHenley (talk) 00:11, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't remember what material I was referring to above, but regarding your message to me on my Talk Page, don't worry about; apology accepted. I myself haven't adhered as strongly to WP guidelines as I should have, as has been pointed out to me regarding my block of Angry Christian. The point is, I can see that you approach Wikipedia in Good Faith, and you should continue to do so. Peace. Nightscream (talk) 03:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Don't be afraid

Don't be afraid to edit at expelled. As far as I'm concerned, your probably the most knowledgeable of the editors there. Don't let those with an agenda to discredit the film control the article. Thanks! Saksjn (talk) 13:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I believe the change in the second paragraph that Nightscream proposed sets a much better tone. I don't really expect a level playing field, but the arguments I'm hearing are so absurd I can't really respond without getting EXPELLED myself.

At some point, SOMEONE will have to point out the fact that the "lack of reliable sources" actually validates the film's premise. I have been trying to formulate that statement in a way that will not immediately get censored. And I plan to introduce it at an opportune time...DrHenley (talk) 00:19, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please consider taking the AGF Challenge

I would like to invite you to consider taking part in the AGF Challenge which has been proposed for use in the RfA process [1] by User: Kim Bruning. You can answer in multiple choice format, or using essay answers, or anonymously. You can of course skip any parts of the Challenge you find objectionable or inadvisable.--Filll (talk) 01:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)