User talk:DrGabriela

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, DrGabriela, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  andy 21:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] 3RR warning

Read WP:3RR. If you revert more than 3 times in 24 hours you may be reported and blocked.Ultramarine (talk) 08:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I will read the policy. I do intend to follow the policies here. Thanks for reminding me. I do notice you have a fair amount of reverting on several articles. I hope that this policy applies to everyone equally?DrGabriela (talk) 09:05, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Arbitration

I have filed a Request for Arbitration involving your account. See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Giovanni33.Ultramarine (talk) 23:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I think your request must have been rejected. I see no such requests. Could this have something to do with the fact that I share Giovanni33's pov in articles and not yours?DrGabriela (talk) 21:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
The case is still going on. You could clear alot of things up if you would go there and say your piece. [[1]]BernardL (talk) 22:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing me in the correct direction, BernardL. I will be happy to clear this false association up with a statement.DrGabriela (talk) 22:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Arbitration case

An Arbitration case involving your account is open and is located at here.Ultramarine (talk) 18:24, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Come join the party

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States Inclusionist (talk) 05:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Azazyel (talk) 05:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I see. Thank you for informing me of this sensible policy. I have stopped edit warring with the SPA account.DrGabriela (talk) 05:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I as not clear about this policy but I will follow it from now on. Edit warring is stupid. It takes two to edit-war, but I'm done. I'll read the policy and and understand how to follow it when I encounter the same situation again. Thanks.DrGabriela (talk) 05:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ScarianCall me Pat! 10:51, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ArbCom case

If you are interested in proving your real world identity as you say in this comment you should probably e-mail the Arbitration Committee and ask them if there is some way for you to do that. You'll find their e-mail address in a box part way down the page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee. Quite frankly if you do not provide some sort of evidence of your real world identity it is quite likely that you will be blocked as a sockpuppet or meatpuppet. The evidence that you are one of those is fairly strong, and you will probably have to convince the committee otherwise. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 22:26, 24 May 2008 (UTC)