User talk:Dralwik
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Dralwik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Lst27 21:57, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Chicago Skyline Labeled
Hello, Thanks for the 5 or so building labels you provided. Keep them coming! Buphoff 03:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signature
Hi Dralwik. When signing your posts on talk pages, please substitute your signature, instead of transcluding it. Instead of typing {{subst:User:Dralwik/Signature}} on each page you sign, you can just put {{subst:User:Dralwik/Signature}} in the signature box in your preferences and check the box labeled "raw signature". Then you can sign with the regular ~~~~. Thanks. —Mets501 (talk) 15:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
--- Dralwik|Have a Chat My "Great Project" 15:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] CHICOTW
I see your user name listed as a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago. I do not know if you are aware that we are attempting to revive the CHICOTW. See our results history. We could use additional input in nominating future articles, voting on nominees and editing winning nominees. Should you contribute you will receive weekly notices like the following:
|
||
Last week you voted for the Chicago COTW. Thank you! This week Rich Melman has been chosen. Please help improve it towards the quality level of a Wikipedia featured article. See the To Do List to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list.
|
||
|
TonyTheTiger 00:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] CHICOTW - AT&T Corporate Center past editor
|
||
In the past you have edited AT&T Corporate Center. This week it has been selected as the WikiProject Chicago Collaboration of the week. Each week a Chicago related article in need of attention is selected as the Chicago COTW. Feel free to come help us improve it towards the quality level of a Wikipedia featured article. Your input in future selections would also be appreciated. See the To Do List to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list.
|
||
|
TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 15:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] I (televison network)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on I (televison network), by Bachrach44 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because I (televison network) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting I (televison network), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] City renaming poll
Greetings! Some time ago you wrote this on my talk page:
- Serge, just contact me for each poll and I'll lend my vote gladly. This [[City, State]] convention as a strict rule has got to go. --- Dralwik|Have a Chat My "Great Project"
I'm hereby contacting you accordingly... Check out this poll. --Serge 01:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] One North LaSalle
I have added better sources for the claim you dispute. Let me know what you think.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Hey. Thanks for the quick reply. Yes I think you are making a great point. I am not a skyscraper buff. However, I do understand that there are several definitions of tallest building. Some include steeples and/or antennas. I think the two sources you removed are referring to definitions that exclude extras. That seems pretty easy to understand based on the diagram you point to. How could put this building's best foot forward with its claim to have been the tallest by another definition. You seem tobe against including the references I added. I think we should readd them in a way that makes it clear the claim is based on an alternate definition. What do you think?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
-
- Let's debate this at Talk:One North LaSalle.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)