User talk:Drakehellman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Drakehellman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Powers ^T 18:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 Minor Pirates of the Caribbean characters 2 Re: Organization XIII 3 Will Turner 4 James Norrington Toys 5 WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants April 2007 Newsletter 6 Black Pearl 7 Beckett 8 WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants May 2007 Newsletter 9 Image:Lucky.JPG 10 Barbossa in AWE videogame 11 Spoiler tag in Jack Sparrow article 12 Captain Hector Barbossa 13 SpongeBob 14 SpongeBob 15 WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants June 2007 Newsletter 16 Orphaned non-free image (Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png) 17 Fair use disputed for Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png 18 Orphaned non-free media (Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png) 19 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boingo.jpg 20 WP:AUK

[edit] Minor Pirates of the Caribbean characters

You've been doing the right thing, good work. That's what we're here for. Good show. Dac 22:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

That sort of thing is more or less out of my hands. I know there's a distinct lack of information but it's both sourced and relevant so I don't see much of a problem with it. Dac 22:52, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, minor characters with no citations can go. Good show. Dac 23:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Organization XIII

Sure, I think you just have to request it somewhere. Not sure where though. Just search for something like "Semi-protection" and it'll probably tell you what to do. The Splendiferous Gegiford 13:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Will Turner

I haven't gone via the Will Turner page in a long time, it isn't on my watchlist. However, if they're saying that, then yes, definitely add a protect. Dac 22:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Simple reverting maybe, but if it's repeated reverting of the same thing, there's grounds to have it protected. Dac 22:31, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] James Norrington Toys

I am more than willing to allow it, albeit perhaps more condensed, in the toys section, yes. However, toys are not, nor have they ever, been canon for a movie series, as I'm sure you're aware. Thanks, man. Dac 11:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

No, I am entirely satisfied with how you've worked it in. More so, in fact, since you also appear to have removed some uncertain wording from it as well. I appreciate it, my friend. Good job. And feel free to take the initiative on matters such as this in future, you're more than welcome to. Dac 11:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants April 2007 Newsletter

[edit] Black Pearl

I believe that this was because the trailer portrayed the Pearl exchanging fire with the Dutchman in the whirlpool; it is apparently recognisable as the Pearl. Dac 08:16, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Beckett

Oh well. My mistake. I guess I was wrong about Beckett, but he is the main antogonist. -LooneyGeoffrey

[edit] WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants May 2007 Newsletter

[edit] Image:Lucky.JPG

Hello, Drakehellman. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Lucky.JPG) was found at the following location: User:Drakehellman/Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 19:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Barbossa in AWE videogame

I've seen and played as Barbossa in the PC version. You can play as him in Singapore and while rescuring Jack from Davy Jones' Locker. A friend of mine bought Wii version and he also confirmed that he played as Barbossa.

Apparently, there are two versions of the game: one for XBox 360 and PS3, and other for PS2/PC/Wii. So, Barbossa is definitely in the latter one.

[edit] Spoiler tag in Jack Sparrow article

I believe that the summaries will have to be rewritten if we are not to add spoiler tags. The truth of the Jack Sparrow article is that there are spoilers in it because it mainly summarizes the movie, not the actions of Jack himself. Therefore it requires a spoiler tag. I will attempt to re-write it without spoilers. Therefore the tag will not be needed. Happy Editing! --MajinVegeta 06:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Captain Hector Barbossa

In all examples of people with the prefix captain in Wikipedia (including, quite pertinently, Captain Jack Sparrow) we have the prefix captain followed by the name of the article subject. There is simply no point in having "Hector Barbossa better known as Captain Barbossa". It is a cumbersome way of wording the whole sentence. It is surely much better just to name him as Captain Hector Barbossa as I have done? Comments? Benbristol 00.28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Apologies. My bad. It seems as if captain is generally left out of article titles. However, I still think the sentence is cumbersome. It may be advisable to remove mention of him being Captain Barbossa and just state that Hector Barbossa is a former captain of the Black Pearl? I don't know. Benbristol 00.31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SpongeBob

Creator Stephen Hillenburg Wants SpongeBob SquarePants To Remain Ageless So Stop Putting That 1986 Birthdate On SpongeBob Biography

PS Leave The July 14th Birthdate Alone And Don't Put The 1986

No, it's already been discussed in the SpongeBob SquarePants group area. So stop taking it out. Captain Drake Van Hellsing Savvy? 01:41, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Creator Stephen Hillenburg has always said that he wanted SpongeBob to remain ageless

Hillenburg stated later in an interview that it was only in a dream and cannot be confirmed

Regardless on that info, it is to remain in there, as it has already been discussed, and removing it will result in vandalism. Captain Drake Van Hellsing Savvy? 03:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

SpongeBob's Age Was Never Mentioned On The Show At All

It was shown on the episode Sleepy Time. Captain Drake Van Hellsing Savvy? 03:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Like I said before Hillenburg stated later in an interview that it was only in a dream and cannot be confirmed.

So what? It is information on SpongeBob regardless, and, like I said before, it's already been disucssed and is to remain in the regardless. Captain Drake Van Hellsing Savvy? 03:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SpongeBob

I Read Somewere That SponegeBob Was Born July 14th 1980

It'll be better to bring that up on the talk page so that others may discuss it. But so far, It's being kept at 1986, however, you are still free to discuss it. Captain Drake Van Hellsing Savvy? 06:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

SpongeBob Wasn't Born In 1986 OK

And how do you know that? Besides, don't complain to me, bring it up on the talk page. And please, sign your posts too. Captain Drake Van Hellsing Savvy? 22:57, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Because SpongeBob's Age Was Never Said And The Creator Want SpongeBob To Remain Ageless

• Sigh* Will you please stop whinning to me and bring up the matter on the talk page so that other may discuss it as well? Captain Drake Van Hellsing Savvy? 01:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants June 2007 Newsletter

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png

Thanks for uploading Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boingo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Boingo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:AUK

This is an invitation to WikiProject Auckland, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's articles on Auckland. Please feel free to join us.

Taifarious1 09:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)