User talk:Drag-5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Drag-5! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Kukini 21:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content is considered vandalism and may result in a block. jgpTC 20:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. jgpTC 20:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

It is NOT original content. I have sources. if you need proof, then you should attach a 'citation required' to it. you are behaving immaturely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drag-5 (talk • contribs)

Yes, it is original content. Per Jimbo, "There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a "needs a cite" tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information" [1] jgpTC 20:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
you are wrong. that quote may be relevant if I had not had numerous experiences with people being prejudiced towards tokusatsu. note the following link as evidence. http://www.theguyver.net/guyverboard/index.php?s=&showtopic=4780&view=findpost&p=55659
another link where kamen rider is placed in the 'kids show and cartoons' section. http://forums.televisionwithoutpity.com/index.php?s=63b4a2087f9f640f97f4e97d5f87b2f0&showtopic=3115553&pid=7181376&st=45&#entry7181376Drag-5 20:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Neither of those are reliable sources. Your interpretations are original research. jgpTC 20:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
so if it can't be verified, it's not allowed? fair enough. maybe you should have explained that on your first edit reversion instead of simply changing it back. it would have saved a lot of hassle. and it's no good citing what the other guy said when he reverted it because all he wrote was an insulting comment about my writing. not exactly breeeding good faith. I'm normally a pretty easy going guy but you really didn't act in a very agreeable manner. just deleted my writing without so much as an explaination. Drag-5 21:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:003sho.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:003sho.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 16:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are saying. I'm not very good with legal talk. if the image is a problem then please remove it. Drag-5 21:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:004mizuki.jpg

I have tagged Image:004mizuki.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 16:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:005agito.jpg

I have tagged Image:005agito.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 16:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:024alkanphel.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:024alkanphel.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 07:34, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:023hayami.jpg

I have tagged Image:023hayami.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 09:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC) can you please tell me how to delete images, I am getting tired of these messages. Drag-5 14:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tokusatsu

I know you're trying to do well, but there's a reason that I had used automatic rollback there. The website that you maintain (as is clearly stated on your user page) is not an appopriate external link to utilize in the article, mostly because you support violating copyright by telling people how to get illegal copies (fansubs).

Also, the information added in the revert you made was extraneous details relating to topics related to, but not central to, the subject of the article. Most of it was a biography of Eiji Tsuburaya, information about Suitmation, the methods of suitmation, or original synthesis, particularly the "criticism" section which was mostly fans complaining about it on Wikipedia, without any actual critical commentary from real world cultural anthropologists or film critics.

All in all, please read into everything a bit more before you blindly revert me for what you perceive as vandalism, particularly when its coming from an administrator.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 19:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Big things like that should be given a reason though. after all wikipedia is a public project. As an administrator you should know better. if you felt that the information was extranious, then should you not have posted in the discussion area? or instead converted said information into pages suited to that information? not just simply delete all that persons work with not even a word to explain why. Drag-5 20:25, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Because everything that had been added was removed sometime late last year/earlier this year during a massive reformatting of the page. The massive section on Tsuburaya was removed, and it was added back by that IP for reasons that I will never know. See this, this, and just browse through the page history to see how the article has improved by removing the really esoteric and specific information that has a much better home on your website or another fan project.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:006tetsuro.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:006tetsuro.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] your edits to the Guyver disambiguation page

On Guyver you clearly linked to a site [imdb] that stated the title of the film without a 2, and what use is "Guyver - DJ." on a disambiguation page? that article doesn't exist! If wished, I will continue this on the talk page of the subject, but please stop reverting edits, as your actions could be concidered a act of edit war, and as you yourself have stated: "edit wars are clearly against wikipedia policy".  Doktor  Wilhelm  01:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC) your edits are disruptive to wikipedia. we are both reverting edits, but you have unfounded reason for changing these things. you should discuss these things and get more views on the subject before vandalising the article. if you continue to revert edits without discussing it, it will be taken to a higher authority. if you can justify your edits they will remain, but currently you have no justification and no consensus. wikipedia acts on concesus, not personal opinion. I strive to retain hte integrity of an article until a consensus can be reached. Drag-5 (talk) 01:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I have added in a ref for the title, and I have stated my reasons on the talk page that you posted on! you also have no justification and no consensus, though I have a reference for the name! If this matter continues, we shall have to take it to a higher authority, s you yourself threaten, and I will discuss it with them!  Doktor  Wilhelm  01:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I do not need consensus for something that has already recieved concensus. it recieved consensus due to the fact it has been that way for just over a month. not to mention this was edited by somebody else and i gave my concensus for it, that makes 2 people in favour of this version if not more.Drag-5 (talk) 01:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
There has been no attenpt to seek concensus on the matter before now, just because no-one changed something that is wrong, doesn't make it right!  Doktor  Wilhelm  01:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Consensus Drag-5 (talk) 01:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)