Talk:Drayton, Somerset

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject UK geography      (Rated Stub-Class) This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements. United Kingdom Portal Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. (Add assessment comments) Low This article has been rated as low-importance within the UK geography WikiProject. WikiProject England      (Rated Stub-Class) England Portal This article is supported by WikiProject England, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to articles relating to England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article associated with this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. WikiProject Somerset (Rated Stub-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Somerset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Somerset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class. Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Reference numbering problem

The list of references has two entries, each numbered "1". I'm guessing this is a consequence of the use of different reference templates. It may be that the Somerset population estimates template is causing the problem, but I'm not sure, and I'm not familiar with that template anyway, so I'm not going to try to correct the problem. JamesMLane t c 21:56, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

You were right there were 2 ref templates in use - I have updated the population figure one to the current recomended style Template:Cite web & it has resolved the problem (It's probably best to link to the specific PDF rather than the general county oneanyway).— Rod ^talk 07:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)