Talk:Dragons of Kir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Importance

Since the question was asked in the edit summary, I gave this game a high importance because it won an Origins Vanguard Award. Out of curiosity, what criteria would you use to rate a game's importance? There are some obvious factors like sales (but how much sales makes it "significant"), "importance" to the gaming community (but how do you measure that), influence on other games, etc. I thought that an objective criteria is that it won an award (i.e. it's a measure assigned outside of my own opinion, or lack of, about the game). And since Vanguard awards are supposed to be given to innovative games, that's why I rated it "high". --Craw-daddy | T | 00:54, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm, of course upon closer examination I see that it wasn't Dragons of Kir that won the award, but the game to which it was a follow-up.  :( My mistake then, and you were right to fix it. --Craw-daddy | T | 00:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)