User talk:Dr unix
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Socket F(1207)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Socket F(1207), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Socket F. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of AMD Family 10h
A tag has been placed on AMD Family 10h requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. // Chris (complaints)•(contribs) 04:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Chris I was trying to do a redirection, and I think I have now done it the correct way vs. what the AMD Family 10h article initially had. Please let me know if the redirection was was not done correctly. Dr unix (talk) 23:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of AMD Family10h
An editor has nominated AMD Family10h, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMD Family10h and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your edits to x86-64
Regarding binary prefixes, from Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#Binary_prefixes
" There is no consensus to use the newer IEC-recommended prefixes in Wikipedia articles to represent binary units. There is consensus that editors should not change prefixes from one style to the other, especially if there is uncertainty as to which term is appropriate within the context—one must be certain whether "100 GB" means binary not decimal units in the material at hand before disambiguation. When this is certain the use of parentheses for binary prefixes, for example "256 KB (256×210 bytes)", is acceptable, as is the use of footnotes to disambiguate prefixes. Use of IEC prefixes is also acceptable for disambiguation (256 KiB). When in doubt, stay with established usage in the article, and follow the lead of the first major contributor. Prefixes in directly quoted passages are never changed; if explanation is necessary, use a more exact measurement in square brackets. " (emphasis added)
You might also refer to http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html , and to binary prefixes.
Will you please revert your changes to the prefixes? I could, but you are in a better position to retain the other changes you made in the same edit. Jeh (talk) 04:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
