User talk:Dr Lisboa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Dr Lisboa (talk • contribs • block logauto • rfcu • ssp) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "the sole reason given for sock puppetry claims is reverting deletions of sections of the Jesus article. yet all those editors who repeatedly deleted the section have not been questioned or criticised. There is obvious religious bias from the Administrator that has blocked everybody that opposes the deletions. He has not blocked or even warned all of those people that repeatedly did the deleting of the section. Double standards are being applied based on religious bias"

Decline reason: "Confirmed abusive sockpuppeteer, see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dr Lisboa. — Yamla 15:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Yamla has completely failed to provide any evidence that opposes what I have written. Are the standards of these assessmenst so low that evidence and explanations are never provided ? Can an Admninistrator that actually knows how to do the job look at this."

Decline reason: "A CheckUser has confirmed that sock puppetry has taken place using this account per this case file and as such, this block is considered final and cannot be appealed any further. --  Netsnipe  ►  16:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.