User talk:Dr. Submillimeter
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives |
Contents |
[edit] Astrophysics
I don't know the history of that page; I noticed it has bounced back and forth between article and redirect a few times. I noticed you seem to be not very active, but have just come back to restore the redirect, although the article itself seemed to be actively edited. The discussion on the talk page seems sparse; is there a discussion somewhere else about it? — Carl (CBM · talk) 18:18, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- If the information in the article was incorrect, I would think you could have simply edited it to fix it? Did other people disagree with you about it? As I said, I'm not familiar with the history there at all. — Carl (CBM · talk) 18:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Are you back?
We could use you around here. Or is that too much to hope for right now? --Kbdank71 18:25, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Can't say I blame you. It certainly does get tiring. Oh well, I just saw your talk page show up on my watch list, didn't mean to bother you. Remember if you ever want to return, there are many who appreciate what you do. --Kbdank71 18:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Strongly seconded : ) - jc37 06:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Astronomy versus Astrophysics
Please see discussion here. WilliamKF (talk) 16:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Mathieu groups
Are you still interested in seeing the article on Mathieu groups revised to appeal to a less technical readership? I am thinking about it. Possibly a revision of the first section. Scott Tillinghast, Houston TX (talk) 05:07, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
And I have done a revision of the part above the table of contents. I name some things that are interesting about these groups. Scott Tillinghast, Houston TX (talk) 21:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)