User talk:Dr. R.K.Z

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Dr. R.K.Z, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  Academic Challenger 02:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to National Wrestling Alliance

Do not post rumors and speculation, they will be reverted. Neither the NWA nor TNA have said anything about a spilt. TJ Spyke 11:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Sigh...whatever. Dr. R.KZ. 15:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AFD tag removal

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Notable animated series finales (1990s) — it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. (This also refers to Notable animated series finales (1980s) and Notable animated series finales (2000s). These AFDs have closed, but please remember this in the future.) --Coredesat 06:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

No reasons were given, which I think is what is needed to make such nominations plausible, there should be a rule demanding that valid and appropriate credentials be given to why the articles should be taken out. If it said "should be merged in Series Finale", I would NOT have deleted it. But since it had nothing, I deleted it.

Dr. R.K.Z. 18:01, 24th March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:4439224.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:4439224.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This edit summary is uncalled for

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Homefill 19:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

You've made plenty of insults yourself pal. Pot, kettle, black. Leave the FG guides alone. I've reported your "clean up" efforts, expect ALL FG episodes to be locked until you cease your activities on the guides and go elsewhere here.

Dr. R.KZ. 21:01, 28th March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stop trying to make a POINT

Please stop the reverting. By your own admission, you are doing it to be disruptive. This sort of behavior, coupled with your history of personal attacks marks you as an editor that is missing the whole point of Wikipedia, let alone AGF. We have a legitimate disagreement about editorial style; the place to settle it is on the articles talkpage and through our diuspute resolution process, not by making personal attacks on other editors. I must demand that you stop characterizing the edits of other editors as vandalism, that you follow our policy of [[WP:|assuming good faith]], and that you stop with the personal attacks. Thank you. Homefill 21:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

It is my opinion that what you do is constantly vadalize and impede the structure of a very informative structured environment. What you consider that opinion to be in your own view is no concern of mine.

I have read on your own user page that you now regret your "harsher hand approach" and are having second thoughts of going around the, aggresive means of addressing people who fight to retain the "Cultural References", keep up that behaviour and maybe I WILL respect your stance

And please stop pressing the "Yale school rule book" of what passes for procedures in my face. Speak like an individual without them for once. One would think you're taking a non-paying job far too seriously.

[edit] May 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Momusufan 16:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


If you are referring to the Doctor Who episodes, I did that because they were too elongated, look at other serial summaries to see how a plot should be detailed in an article. I cleaned it up, that should not be considered "Vandalism", but rather an attempt at clarifying the article.

[edit] AfD nomination of Superman III: The Junkyard Cut

I've nominated Superman III: The Junkyard Cut, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Superman III: The Junkyard Cut satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superman III: The Junkyard Cut and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Superman III: The Junkyard Cut during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Phydend 21:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Remove it. The project's been dead for months. No argument from me.

Dr. R.KZ. 01:22, 15th June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Commercial use of Image:Prsuperlegends.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Prsuperlegends.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Prsuperlegends.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Prsuperlegends.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ScrewAttack

The IP vandal I referred to was the one editing the article right before you, and I inadvertently reverted your edits as well. No reason to resort to name calling for an honest mistake. In fact, you did the same thing by reverting me again, thereby putting back the anon's edits as well.--Atlan (talk) 11:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

I apologise. Dr. R.K.Z

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:C719391q8gr.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:C719391q8gr.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 05:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please use more edit summaries

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Smurfs Go Pop!, you will be blocked from editing. --Pumpmeup 08:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

How was that vandalizm? It was cementing concrete fact. All of a sudden additional information is a bannable offense? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. R.K.Z (talk • contribs) 08:27, 4 November 2007

See WP:NOR and WP:VERIFY. Additional content without proper sources placed is vandalism. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

...This was about source citing? Thanks contribs 18:59 5th November 2007 (UTC)

Hey, man. I'm actually not an administrator, so I'm not sure I can help you out with this. Sorry. C1k3 22:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

I thought you were...nevermind, it's seemingly be settled contribs 02:53 6th November 2007 (UTC)

BTW, you have as just as much power as I do, and weight to throw :-). Sometimes while patrolling for vandals I make mistakes with my warnings, as everyone does. In future, if you have a problem with someone's comments on your talk page, try taking it up politely with them. Sorry for any hassle caused. Cheers, Pumpmeup 10:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)#


You're fired. ^_^ contribs 13:57 27th December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:A545ac193ada816bae3432f068b93688.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:A545ac193ada816bae3432f068b93688.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:80m.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:80m.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to John Cena appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Zenlax T C S 19:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed deletion of Star Trek movie curse

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Star Trek movie curse, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:09, 27 May 2008 (UTC)