User talk:Downtowndontay
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nicely with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on [[User talk:{{{1}}}|my talk page]]. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here! --Ginkgo100 talk · contribs · e@ 16:20, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Some Wikipedia policies
Please read up on Wikipedia policies and guidelines, including Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Citing sources. Material may be removed from articles for a number of reasons. You can insure that the material you add to articles will remain there if you follow the policies and guidelines I've listed above. -- Donald Albury(Talk) 02:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Request for adminship
Hello! I noticed you have requested adminship.[1] However, I removed your request because it is bad formatted. If you check it, you will notice you haven't answered the first two questions, you haven't signed your acceptance, and you should have replaced the YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER text with an explanation of why you are nominating yourself.
If you really want to follow this course, then correct those mistakes, and add your nomination again at the top of the list of requests, not at the bottom as you did. However, I suggest you to think it twice, as it seems you don't really know how to request adminship, having done these mistakes. In any case, good luck! -- ReyBrujo 03:37, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hi; it is certain your request not go succeed. Most users who apply for adminship have been active on the project for many months and made thousands of edits; see the standards page for a random sample of what kinds of nominees voters will support. Perhaps try adminship again in a few months after you've gained a bit more experience with the project; I invite you to contribute to the encyclopedia in the interum. ~ PseudoSudo 03:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Btain.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Btain.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Zack and cody
Plz help Please help stop redirecting episodes for Zack and cody and having separate episode pages .
[edit] WP:CVU status
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of FCAT Explorer
A tag has been placed on FCAT Explorer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justin Eiler (talk) 18:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)