Talk:Down and Dirty Duck

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Down and Dirty Duck has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
May 9, 2007 Good article nominee Listed

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Films     (Rated GA-Class)   (Rated Low importance) Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale. Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. Additional Information: WikiProject Animation / American Animation       (Rated GA-Class) Animation Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines. GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject American Animation. (rated as Mid importance) Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. WikiProject Furry (Rated GA-Class) Down and Dirty Duck is within the scope of WikiProject Furry, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to furry fandom. For more information, visit the project page. GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Was this movie based on Bobby London's comic or not. It doesn't look much like that, according to the movie poster...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.232.72.148 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 29 November 2005.

No, it was not. I added some information about the connections between the comic strip and the film (or lack of). (Ibaranoff24 19:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC))

[edit] Copyedit

This article, or a portion of it, was copyedited by the League of Copyeditors in April 2007. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Copyeditor(s): Cricketgirl 22:16, 21 April 2007 (UTC) Proofreader: Finetooth 20:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Failed "good article" nomination

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of May 8, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Satisfactory Contains shortened word such as ad these should be written correctly.

2. Factually accurate?: Fail Several areas are missing references such as the quote: "Dirt Duck received mostly negative reviews" and others, especially in the plot section.

3. Broad in coverage?: Pass Could be border but its satisfactory

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass No non-neutral text in it

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images?: Pass A small selection of images, all with fair use rationales.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far. — The Sunshine Man 11:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't think there is a requirement that statements in the intro need to have inline citations, and the critic's section reveals the mostly negative reviews. For the plot, probably only the "Dirty Duck is notable for its use of in-jokes." statement needs to have an inline citation. --Nehrams2020 18:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• I have addressed the issues that have been brought up. Please take a look at the current revision and re-review its GA status. (Ibaranoff24 21:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC))