Talk:Douglas Kim

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
Photo request It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.

Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
This article is part of WikiProject Poker, an attempt at building a useful poker resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page.


is there anything wrong w/ 'original research' if you know the guy in person

Yes, it is still WP:OR because is not verifiable through reliable sources. Therefore, it can't be added. -- moe.RON talk | done | doing 17:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Notable?

I tried to establish more notability (i.e. he earned nearly $2.4 million in one tournament - not many people can say that as well as other information). I deleted original research and added three valid sources. Others' thoughts on notability now? Also, it's possible he was born in 1983, and just turns 23 later this year....-67.175.191.238 20:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I agree that a final table at the WSOP Main Event should qualify someone for notable. In addition to the huge payout they get, they also always get plenty of TV coverage and interviews with various media outlets. However, there seems to be a precedent against making an article for someone just because they made the final table. About half of the guys from the 2005 and 2004 main event final tables don't have articles. AFink 00:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC)