User talk:Dos lingo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] WP:AIV

Please note, I've delisted an entry you placed on AIV, as it was not Obvious Vandalism. 3RR vios should be placed at WP:AN/3RR. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 22:55, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Loraine O'Donnell

Hello Dos, - Perhaps you can help on the above article that you recently added a talk page comment to - please see my recent comments on that talk page. I believe this in non-notable, and verging on spam. Your thoughts are very welcome. Pedro1999a |  Talk  23:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Gone now !! Thankyou, nevertheless. Pedro1999a |  Talk  23:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Could not find the article to go back to.However,your welcome. Dos lingo 19:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

What? Again. When I first created this I was blocked for the same thing.HELLO this I.P is AOL and ALL AOL I.P's are SHARED!

  • No they aren't AOL now forwards the appropriate headers to determine the real IP, irrespective the address you've listed isn't an AOL address it is a UUNET address. --pgk 22:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Pgk,I currently dial from Roanoke,VA my ISP is AOL the number used to dial is 540-725-9801.If you have AOL please check this for your self.Dos lingo 23:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

And you've left this message on my talk page, which means you aren't blocked, if you were blocked this is the only page you could edit. Use the whois link, the address you have given is registered to UUNET, if AOL have some deal with UUNET I've no idea, the point is that it isn't shared so you indignancy is misplaced. Finally giving me an email address proves nothing, I have many email addresses, doesn't mean I use all of them as ISPs. --07:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am not a sock puppet of Piratesofsml please check your facts on user Piratesofsml page.Collateral damage WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK "Blocks should not be used against isolated incidents of vandalism. Dynamic IPs: up to 24 hours. AOL IPs and range blocks: about 15 minutes, then 1-3 hours, and 24 at most, to avoid collateral damage. User accounts with persistent violations may be blocked indefinitely." Or do I need to find a way to change my IP so I won't be confused with the Pirate guy?"

Decline reason: "The above wikilawyering is strangely familiar. Anyone with a better memory than me able to produce a diff? Anyway, obvious sock, thanks for coming, you've been great. -- ⇨REDVEЯS 21:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Wikilawyering difs here. Patstuarttalk|edits 15:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Once again I am not User:Piratesofsml and the unblock request is not visable at Category:Requests_for_unblock like the block templet says. Dos lingo 15:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "Sockpuppetry case clear enough."

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.