Dorchester Finance v. Stebbing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dorchester Finance Co. v. Stebbing [1989] BCLC 498 is a UK company law case under the wrongful trading provision of the Insolvency Act 1986 s.214.
of a company must act in good faith and in the interests of the company, he must display such skill as may reasonably be expected of a person with his knowledge and experience, and he must at all times take such care as a prudent man would take on his own behalf.
Contents |
[edit] Facts
Dorechester Finance, which had gone insolvent, made a claim against Mr Stebbing and two other accountants who were non-executive directors. They often signed blank cheques, which were later countersigned by Mr Stebbing.
[edit] Judgment
Foster J held that directors of a company were bound to act in good faith and in the interests of the company (see now, s.172 Companies Act 2006). They also had to display such skill and care as should be reasonably expected from people with their knowledge and experience (see now, s.174 Companies Act 2006). The system of signing blank cheques was held to be negligent, and liable for losses under s.214 IA 1986.
Furthermore, no distinction should be drawn in principle between an executive and a non-executive director.
Foster J held further that it would not be appropriate for the court to exercise its discretion to relieve the three directors on the basis that they acted "honestly and reasonably" under s.448 of the Companies Act 1948 (see now s.1157(1) Companies Act 2006).
