Talk:Don Sherwood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
WikiProject Dartmouth College This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dartmouth College, which collaborates on articles related to Dartmouth College.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
No This article is on a subject of no importance within WikiProject Dartmouth College.

This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Don Sherwood is part of WikiProject U.S. Congress, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the United States Congress.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
The options are: "FA", "A", "GA", "B", "Start", "Stub", "List", "Disambiguation", "Template", or "Category."
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
The options are: "Top", "High", "Mid", and "Low."
??? This article has not yet been assigned a subject.
The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", and "Event."


[edit] Election season

An anonymous user has been inserting a statement from a DC police officer who claims Sherwood received preferential treatment, and said Sherwood should have been arrested. See the following from this newspaper article [1]...

Responding to Ruiz’s comments, a commander in the department said Ruiz never interviewed Sherwood and doesn’t know all the details of the case.
Commander Thomas McGuire of Metropolitan Police Department’s District 1 insists Sherwood did not receive preferential treatment.
“These allegations are always made” in cases involving a political official in Washington, McGuire said.

Because Ruiz never interviewed Sherwood, his comments appear unfair, and do not belong here.

Now, to whether Chris Carney should be referred to as "Lt. Commander" or "...Naval Reserve lieutenant commander." Because Carney political career, not his military career, is the primary focus, I feel he should not be identified as "Lt. Commander," though his military title and branch of service should definitely be mentioned.

I know this is election season, but let's be fair and neutral, OK? Name Not Needed 02:01, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

I think the issue about the quote is an issue within the publication. The publication, however, is still reputable, no? Jesuschex 00:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)