User talk:Dominik92

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Dominator is currently, or is about to be, on vacation in real life from 28 June 2008 until 24 August 2008 and may not be able to respond immediately to queries. He or she may pop in now and then from an available online source.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

[edit] Re:Back?

LOL, I'll probably be back a little more than I have been, but nothing compared to what I use to be. I enjoy free time not spent on here all day. Thanks for your post, bud! Ctjf83Talk 06:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] well, I'm back

Ta-da!!! She magically reappears, refreshed and rejuvenated and renewed and re-everything elsed. I'm still pretty busy but I'm getting back into the Wikigroove again. God knows there was enough drama while I was gone... every time I leave there's more and more crap to read about when I come back, usually in the form of ArbCom requests and ANI threads that take up 25 or 35 screen views. I seem to miss all the big kerfluffles, but somehow I don't feel left out or abandoned when I'm not included. :-)

Do you want to resume now or would you like to start back up again when you return from your vacation? It's up to you, 'cause I'll still be here when you get back. The break won't have any effect on your RFA, so don't give that a second thought. I had to take a little more than 3 months off back in 2006 and had no problems. It's running away in a snit that causes concern, not vacations.

Let me know what you'd like to do. Good to see you again! :-) - KrakatoaKatie 02:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, my vacation doesn't start until almost four weeks from now so I'd like to get a good chunk of my training done before it. I was planning the whole time to go to RfA after the vacation because I'd like some time to pass after my blocks. But I'm eager to get back into training again! The Dominator^Talk_Edits 03:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Okay - sounds good to me. I've got toothpicks holding up my eyelids so I'm about to knock off for the night, after I finish the current WP:CP log I'm on, so we'll pick up Friday. 'Night! - KrakatoaKatie 04:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

G'night! The Dominator^Talk_Edits 04:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Mickey Mouse Club

I am having trouble with an editor removing information of mine that is sourced and cited very well. They are telling me that an "uninterested" editor needs to publish the information, which makes no sense to me as an "uninterested" editor would have no reason to do so. Zachary Jaydon was a cast member on The Mickey Mouse Club, and I have cited numerous Official, Reliable, Non-Secondary Disney Publications that provide this information clearly. The editor keeps removing the information without taking the time to check the sources, which can be done if a small amount of effort is put into it. I believe that this goes against Wiki policy as well as a major lack of the assumption of good faith. Removing unsourced information is one thing, but when an editor takes the time to make an article more informative and accurate, it's very discouraging. Please help!

Skyler Morgan (talk) 20:32, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Is there any way you can help me out with yet another AfD for my article on Zachary Jaydon. How many times can an article be AfD'd before it remains a part of Wiki?

There seems to be confusion as to the relation between Jaydon D. Paull & Zachary Jaydon. They are one in the same. A large percentage of performers/artists don't go by their legal name. Any notability no matter which of the two names they are credited under are still assertions of nobility under either or both. Many people are eliminating anything that can be user uploaded or changed. I agree with the principle of this in general, however, videos, magazine scans and the such are irrefutable proof of events or facts no matter where they came from. If there is a video of Mr. Jaydon playing with a National Rock Band, you can't say that because it was put up by a "user" that the fact doesn't remain.

While every sentence of this Wiki Article isn't strongly sourced, it doesn't mean he doesn't meat notability requirements for an article. I have scanned and uploaded quite a few of my sources at: http://zacharyjaydonwiki.blogspot.com/

Also, the following was taken directly from WP:N#MUSIC:

Criteria for composers and lyricists

For composers, songwriters, librettists or lyricists:

  1. Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition.

Jaydon has written material on several Multi-Platinum records, including *NSYNC, Craig David, Ryan Cabrera and others. These WERE songs that were included on these albums. They weren't scrapped, or obscure B-Sides. These were songs included on official releases by MAJOR artists. He obviously has notable talent if these artists are choosing to work with him. This is obviously an arguable issue, but given the success of the albums his work has been featured on, it seems at the VERY least, notable. These credits are easily verifiable here:

([1], [2], [3])

The 3 above sources are all from www.ASCAP.com which is one of the most trusted sources used on Wiki for Songwriter Credit Verification.

([4]) also shows from a VERY large, Fortune 500 companies website with information on Close To Home and confirming Mr. Jaydon's Songwriting Credits. This website would be considered reliable on any front, and also independent of the subject himself.

Skyler Morgan (talk) 22:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)