Talk:Dolly Mixture
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A note about my reversion of the anonymous edit of 28 June 2006:
I can't prove that the edit in question was copied and pasted from an inappropriate source, but it certainly looked to me like that's what it was, and it seemed unwise to take chances. In any case, replacing an entire article with a mass of unformatted text is poor etiquette, and shouldn't be encouraged.
If anyone thinks I did the wrong thing, feel free to say so. (Remember that, as always, the edit is preserved in the article history, and can be easily restored if appropriate.) --Paul A 02:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
I restored most of the anonymous edit, especially since: a.) I was unable to find any source on the internet which it could have been copied from (the only source that has the same text appeared several days after(!) the edit) b.) It had some errors in style and grammar (and whatnot) which I don't believe would've been there had it been copy/pasted from a book or a newspaper article.
I have also re-written parts of the text and re-edited the article, so as to give it some structure. Following these corrections, I have changed the class from "stub" to "B". Which I think is fair.
Marx1980 12:08, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
"However, they soon proved to be one of the most talented new-wave pop acts." Anyone care to substantiate this grand claim?