Talk:Dog intelligence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A summary of this article appears in Dog.

Contents

[edit] comment

did the best copyedit I could. If anyone thinks it needs more, please put the tag back.


I have a dog. If you put a blanket over her, she turns in circles until she gets tangled up and falls over. Not very intelligent. I had one that did funny things to my leg, that's not very intelligent either.

Funny, I know a couple of infants that will do about the same thing when covered with a blanket (or even just cry and make no attempt to escape). They must be extremely unintelligent (especially since they are of a supposedly more intelligent species than your dog) according to your logic. The_Irrelevant_One 00:48, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Actually, it says that they are of the same intelligence. Animal intelligence is often compared to humans'. And because very young babies can't solve very many problems, animal intelligence often compared to new-borns and infants intead of adult humans. B katt 500 01:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Note the same text is posted on another website

http://www.tagate.com/dog/page/dog_intelligence.shtml

[edit] intelligence- wide range

intelligence is many different things. like my dogs knows plenty of commands or tricks if you will, but is a dog that doesn't know any stupid? no, maybe the dog that knows no tricks was never taught and they do say it's harder to teach an old dog tricks. so intelligence is such a wide subject that you can't really pen-point-it to any one thing. like is albert einstien stupid because he couldn't spell? no he was good in science and not english. dogs same way- one might be good at commands and one might be good at "common sence". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.238.101.92 (talk • contribs) .

Exactly the point of the article. At least, I hope it's clear that that's the point! (BTW, in my experience, an old dog is no harder to teach tricks to than a younger dog--in particular, if the dog is accustomed to learning things.) 05:04, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Biased Much?

This article does not seem to be reasearched, yet a bunch of dog lovers thoughts about dog intellect. A brain size and surface area should be added. B katt 500 03:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah. It seems to decribe the habits of the owners rather than the natural mental abilities of dogs. Teemu Ruskeepää 13:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Intelligence, in my opinion, is being able to figure things out, not just follow commands and other silly stuff. If intelligence is only the ability of following commands, then we humans must be extremly dumb. B katt 500 18:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
You can train the least intelligent dog on the earth.An intelligent dog can outsmart its owner,get around out of its yard,and stuff like that.--70.165.71.229 22:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
I agree that the article is not well researched, but I don't see a dog lover bias in it. Maybe something got editted out, maybe I'm missing something. My biggest complaint would be that there wasn't very much information in it at all. I don't see a need to fo brain size to be mentioned at all as brain size is not a valid measure of intelligence (perhaps you meant relative to body mass?). Even surface area isn't a definitive measure. Check out this article: http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/kinser/Int1.html . To spoil it a bit "it is probable that the volume of nerve cells may be relatively irrelevant in a discussion of intelligence." Thus Spaketh Dave? 17:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge with The Intelligence of Dogs

Why should there be two articles on a topic so similar? --YoavD 08:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Talking" Dogs?

I have on several occasions seen videos on television and elsewhere of "talking" dogs. These dogs, when given a specific command or question by a human, will respond with a sound resembling a word or phrase such as "yes" or "I love you". I was wondering if this behavior has been studied at all by scientists, whether it is a similar ability to that exhibited by parrots and other birds, and whether it correlates at all with the intelligence of the animal. If there has been anything noted on the subject I think it is definitely worth mentioning in this article. -- Grandpafootsoldier 04:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dog & Intelligence in the same sentence

Sure this is a contradiction.

Please stop this trolling already.


[edit] Dog intelligence test is faulty

The only dog intelligence test that I have heard of is the following: put the dog on a long leash so that the leash goes around a pole, so shortening, and put s food bowl in front of the dog. The dog ought not to reach the bowl. The dog does not understand yjsay it should walk around the pole to get a longer leash, so reaching the food bowl. I think that there are two serious faults with this test: 1) the stimulus of a food bowl is too strong, making thinking impossible. And 2) the dog has been conditioned to a leash: it finds the situationb a social one, one to be solved by persistence and social communication rather than with spatial (or whatever) problem solving skills. A dog can learn to go around a pole by himself, my puppy has! On a walk he undertands the command "This side" meaning: go around the pole so as to unfasten the leash. InsectIntelligence (talk) 14:57, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


A better measure of dogs' intelligence than intelligence tests and the number of tricks learned could be the fact that puppies grow to different kinds of dogs when with different owners: almost all that the puppy does to adabt to its living environment is a measure of its understanding which is thus much greater than the learning of a few tricks when especially taught. So please measure dogs' intelligence by the measure stick of life: by the ability to live a happy satisfying life in the circumstances that one happens to have. Amazingly many dogs survive that test, bringing joy and comfort to their owners too, even though the dogs do not have our habitual ways of thinking which are partly a consequence of the upbrining and the education that we have had - of things that the dog just does not have any experience of. InsectIntelligence (talk) 07:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Increasing your dog's intelligence

If you have a good natural gesture communication with your dog, you can try the following: The task of thinking is to form a correct picture of the environment. That is very close to the task of the senses. If the dog manages to be clear headed about what is where of its experiences, it can learn things quicker. So encourage the dog to use the sense of sight even when it is naturally concentrated mainly on muscle sensations, smells or social life. That can make your dog clear-headed. In addition, encourage your dog to use its senses and listen to its sensations and feelings, so as to observe things better instead of acting out of the memory, or solely out of social kind of guesses of what you want from it. InsectIntelligence (talk) 07:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)