User talk:Docmartincohen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia has categories of contemprary philosphers that seems poorly grounded. Now lot sof people would liek to be considerd 'philosphers' but are they the smae sort of thing as the more conventional philsophers? Should eg. Julian Baginni, Stephen Law be filed alongside John Locke and Thomas Hobbes as 'British Philosphers?

I have just re-edited Julain Baginni's page which describes him as a 'British Philosopher' to make him a British writer specialising in philosophy, which I fell is more useful and more accurate. it is not a dig at him especially. I urge the Wiki editors to change all the loosely defined philosophers similary. However, I see 'Slim' removed this edit before and seems to be busy promoting a small circle of mainly Lonodn based cronies. Who is 'Slim' anyway?