Talk:Do You Like Rock Music?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] "Typically irreverent fashion"

Biased and unsourced

JD777 (talk) 21:11, 16 February 2008 (UTC) Biased? Okay, I'll accept that, in retrospect, this statement seems to represent more personal opinion than solid fact. By definition, an encyclopedia should provide accurate and truthful information from a neutral viewpoint. In other words, I do not oppose the article being amended for that reason.

On the other hand: unsourced? Don't be so stupid. Pitchfork is nothing if not irreverent, and a quick perusal of Wikipedia's own page on their site provides plenty of evidence to support that: their review of The Heavy Metal Box, awarding it 6.66 out of 10; Eric Carr's review of Robert Pollard's Relaxation of the Asshole, awarding it both 10 and 0 out of 10; the "It's up to you" rating of In Rainbows; the chimpanzee-urinating-in-its-own-mouth review of Jet's Shine On... need I continue? What kind of closed-minded individual thinks near-universal consensus requires some kind of citation?

And more to the point, how exactly do you propose I should source it, if I haven't done so already?