User talk:Dmcq

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

About Intent_(software): according to former Tao Group staff there is a version of Intent_(software) that support MMU. Can you modify the page?

Also Tao Group is in administration starting June 13, 2007 (from Register).

I really should only put down what I know - I wouldn't really know what to say about supporting an MMU. I don't think I even put down what chips are/were supported. The Tao Group page says they are in administration and that's the right place I think. You can always edit a page yourself though if you like Dmcq 22:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dance floor (surface)

Please be very careful when throwing the word "vandalism" around. Remember that, on Wikipedia, vandalism is "the deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia". Since my speedy deletion of Dance floor (surface) was not a deliberate attempt to compromise the encyclopedia, it certainly wasn't vandalism.

Now, why do you feel that way? Did the article have some significance? The reason I deleted it is because it was three sentences long and had very little context. One of the three sentences linked to Marley Floors, an article of six sentences that was simply advertising for the company.

Would you like me to restore the "dance floor" article to your userspace? -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 23:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Intent (software)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Intent (software), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

I had a look and that one doing the prod had earlier removed another article by someone else I had found interesting. Seems he goes round doing this to all sorts of things he knows nothing about so I checked a few other related articles at the same time and he'd been doing invalid nn on them despite their references clearing showing notability. And then he's set up a few of his own rather un-notable stub artcles. I suppose it takes all sorts to make wiki. I'd have though there was enough real rubbish arond for him to spend his time on. Dmcq (talk) 10:16, 18 March 2008 (UTC)