User talk:Djungelurban

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Djungelurban, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

TheRingess 01:22, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Page Blanking

On 26-Jan, you blanked Legend of Oasis. Blanking pages is generally considered a bad idea. In cases of redirects to non-existent pages, you should either find a new redirect or put the page up for deletion. I chose to redirect this is The Story of Thor as it is mentioned there. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 14:30, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

Perfecto 17:57, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Grandia Boxart04.jpg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Grandia Boxart04.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 23:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Soulblade2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Soulblade2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:25, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Grandia Boxart04.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Grandia Boxart04.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Thunderbrand 15:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Paparizou

Greekboy didn't say that Bruce Willis is German and Melora Walters is Saudi Arabian. He said that the country field doesnt mentioning ethinicicity but activity. Yes, according to what you said Willis is active in Germany and Walter in Saud Arabia, That doesn't make them German and Saudi Arabian. Yes, Paparizou was born in Sweden but she is active in Greece, that's what goes in the origin/country fields respectively Pictureuploader 21:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

OK, first of all I got your example wrong (I don't even know who Walters is and I don't know what's between Willis and Gemrany) so I admit I havent got your point well so I can't tell if it's right or not. However trust me on this, I live in Greece and I KNOW that Paparizou lives and works here since I see her almost everyday on the media. I don't know who told you that she still ives in Sweden or that she is not 'that active' in Greece. She is pretty much active as Anna Vissi. Pictureuploader 21:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edmonton Oilers

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- JamesTeterenko 19:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

This policy applies to everyone equally. The reason that I singled you out for a warning is that you have had three reverts in the last 24 hours. The other users have had one or two. In any case, revert wars are not productive. Please discuss it on the talk page. -- JamesTeterenko 20:51, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:682682 GS M F.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:682682 GS M F.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:682682 GS M F.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:682682 GS M F.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Meta Knight

FYI. Meta Knight is unprotected and efforts could not be made to make the page strong article rather than a redirectd, and then to encourage later editors to discuss the merge prior to making disruptive edits. No response needed just and FYI. -66.109.248.114 (talk) 02:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC).


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lagoon cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lagoon cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Yes, I could have removed the vandalism from this page in one edit...

...but this method was so much more satisfying. Anyway, I meddled with your new category here to help guarantee its usefulness and continued existence. The rationale is in the edit summary, but I'm semi-open to arguments if you disagree with it. Thanks for making it, our coverage of fan-made translations was significantly hampered some time ago by an editor who has apparently since retired, and who was... how shall I put this... very certain of his own opinions, and not at his best in teamwork. --Kizor 07:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Still, please don't insult vandals. That makes things worse. --Kizor 07:46, 1 June 2008 (UTC)