User talk:DJBullfish/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Wheel of Fortune (US Game Show)

Are you the one who erased the image of the BANKRUPT/$10,000/BANKRUPT space from the section on Round-Specific Spaces? If so, why? What was wrong with having that image on Wikipedia?

--JoBrLa 15:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:$10,000 Space from 2007.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:$10,000 Space from 2007.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

questionable edits to Michael Bloomberg page

Hi DJBullfish, I posted some info on DraftBloomberg.com. It must have sounded promotional. Please let me know what I should adjust so it's fair to post. Maybe it was too many adjectives? :) I'm totally willing to cooperate, just need some guidance. Just created an account if that helps for communicating--username Fosterdt. Thanks!

Dave —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fosterdt (talk • contribs) 02:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Freak the Mighty despeedied

Found a version that makes sense. Dlohcierekim 01:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment: Thanks.DJBullfish (talk) 08:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008 Russian political jokes

Hi, the Russian political jokes page has an amazingly anti communist point of view, is filled with biases, and everytime i try to edit them out i keep having them reversed. If you class it as vandalism could you at least make an attempt to get an admin or allow myself who is a dedicated communist for serveral years and have visited cuba to try to make a point of view change to neutrel which ofc should be checked by admins. Everytime i make an edit it is took back by someone who has 0 regard for communist ideals except simple one liner ideas and in the spirit of wikipedia i would enjoy some help to make the article neutrel as i can perfectly accept that there well be jokes about the soviet state i just dont want an article which would make mc'carthy blush.

cheers, good enough for me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by F4i (talk • contribs) 20:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Kiani

You said I changed the webpage for Kiani. I didn't. So why did you send me a message? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertjessetelford (talk • contribs) 00:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Martina Hingis

Please turn on your brain and think before you randomly accuse people of vandalism.

The paragraph 'controversies' in the Martina Hingis article clearly is only about statements that she herself has made. The sentence in the begin reads: "(...)number of statemtents (...) such as:" Obviously, the last entry about the doping offence does not fit this category, neither in form nor in content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.75.182.214 (talk) 12:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Children's Favourites

You attached a tag to this article today. Any suggestions about what needs to be cleaned up would be welcome. JMcC (talk) 12:46, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for keeping an eye on Inflation! --Rinconsoleao (talk) 11:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi again... I noticed you reverted the obsolete/nonstandard definition of inflation for the standard contemporary definition. Would you mind watching deflation too, where the same battle of usages keeps recurring? Thanks in advance! --Rinconsoleao (talk) 15:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Jas Mann

Um, a bit more caution? You also wiped out a couple of things other editors did to that article in your revert. Pairadox (talk) 07:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I apologize. I thought I'd checked the diff's for any changes which should be integrated in, but unfortunately I appear to have missed them. Sorry. DJBullfish (talk) 07:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Reversion to Personal advertisement

I added a question about your reversion to the article's Talk page. I would appreciate if you could provide a fuller explanation for your edit. Robert.Allen (talk) 08:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps you weren't so totally wrong after all. I just noticed that 420 is already listed, but near the beginning of the list before "A" in the second section. I think I missed it because the "TLA" section precedes it, so it becomes a bit buried in the list. Also I did not realize that numbers should be alphabetized before "A" rather than after "Z". Maybe it would be an improvement to add some sort of separator between the TLA list and the main list of terms. Robert.Allen (talk) 08:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Wheel of Fortune configuration

Much more readable and understandable. Thanks for your contribution! JTRH (talk) 18:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Matthew jamieson

Just a heads up: it was indeed nonsense. User claims person died (past tense) in the year 2012. ;) Redfarmer (talk) 18:17, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:PosterVelvet 01.jpg

I was a little surprised by your revertion of BetacommandBot's tag on Image:PosterVelvet 01.jpg without fixing the simple problem of the missing article name in the FUR. I went ahead and fixed the problem. Just wanted to mention it here as it is an easy fix if you are reverting the tag anyway in case you run into more in the future. I hate the way BetacommandBot works, but it seems that the powers that be like it so I guess that we will have to live with it. Dbiel (Talk) 02:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Clan Young

Bah. Here I was about to give a pithy comment about how you might want to check out the article, and you beat me to the punch whilst I'm typing. Well-played, well-played.... --jonny-mt 06:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


CSD I6

Please stop tagging already tagged images for speedy deletion - I know you're only trying to help, but those images are already listed at C:SD and all you're doing is doubling the backlog. I can barely keep up with your tagging to keep the main portion of CSD clean. east.718 at 07:37, January 24, 2008

No problem! When an image is tagged, it goes into those areas of C:SD which are demarcated by pink bars. That section is, alas, pretty much permanently backlogged. east.718 at 22:47, January 24, 2008

Haha! You actually did the right thing here, it's just that I'm one of the very few editors who prefer to keep all comments. What you did should be encouraged (although it's a bit pointless since I'll see the message anyway :-D). east.718 at 06:10, January 25, 2008

Dude, please stop tagging already tagged images for speedy deletion. All of the big red {{di... }} tags are speedy tags - what you're doing by tagging them again is doubling the workload and moving the images out of the image section of CSD into the main section. If it's already tagged, some admin will get to it sometime. east.718 at 20:48, January 25, 2008

Nope

No i didn't either! But i thought that if this user wished to place an article on wikipedia in a foreign language they should use that languages version of wikipedia to create the article not the English.Thedewster(talk)16:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

ye i thought so. n thanks for checkin its always handy to know what uve put up for deletion! lol .Thedewster(talk)16:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Well that will save me alot of trouble thanks 4 ur help m8. =] Dewster (talk) 16:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

 %25u014Don-ry%25u016B

No idea what happened, Twinkle sort of exploded on me. RogueNinjatalk 02:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Please Read

I am a new member, so excuse me for that article... now I edited it.. It is about the MU Online character class "Blade Knight".

Magic Gladiator (talk) 19:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Paxson-shot.jpg

Hi, I noticed that you removed the {{di-disputed fair use rationale}} and I appreciate that you took the time to make changes to the fair use rationale, but it's up to the closing admin to remove the tag. Also, your changes didn't address the issues I brought up in the dispute tag, but please discuss it at Image talk:Paxson-shot.jpg. Thanks --Mosmof (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay in responding, but thanks for your reply. No worries - I was initially confused about which tag I used, so that makes two of us. --Mosmof (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Bye-bye, welcome message

Nice box.

- CobaltBlueTony™ talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

- CobaltBlueTony™ talk 22:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

ياشا,

Hi, you tagged this as not notable. It should have been tagged as not English as this is the English language wikipedia. Happy patrolling! 08:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

The second half of A2 says "That exists on another Wikimedia project". Considering the article itself (I'm actually somewhat convinced it's very poor quality spam, but I can't cook up a good enough translation to be sure); I highly doubt this is on another Wikimedia project. Hence why I didn't tag it with A2. I tagged it with A1 because it didn't provide enough context to properly identify the matter, because it doesn't appear on another Wikimedia project, and again, because I'm only somewhat sure it's spam.DJBullfish 08:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Signing talk page comments

Hey, thanks for the tip! REGULAR-NORMAL (talk) 04:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)