Talk:Dizrythmia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
 |
Dizrythmia falls within the scope of the Crowded House WikiProject, an effort by Wikipedians to improve articles on the band, its songs, albums, and members (as well as their side projects). For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Mid | This article is on a subject of mid priority within the project | |
|
WikiProject Crowded House Quick Tasks:
|
||
I've removed two bits of trivia in the article. They were edited back in the first time I cut them out; I personally don't feel them to be significant or relevant, and one of them was copied word-for-word from the Enzology website. Whomever edited them back in, please reply to this or send me a message if you disagree with the edit.--Theuniversal 02:42, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
- I'll grant that neither piece of trivia is earth-shaking or vital, but they're interesting asides and take nothing away from the article. The fact that two band members didn't like the final version of the "epic" track is significant, and the Bush connection is an odd coincidence. I don't understand why you see the need to remove these references from the article. (And I could always add a link to the Enzology site, if this is a particularly strong objection.) CJCurrie 23:09, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
-
- I guess it wouldn't be all that great if I just went around vetoing everybody's decisions, so I'll just settle for having the source link in there (already done). Sorry for the minor edit war there.--TheUniversal 00:01, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
