Talk:Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Christianity This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Redirect This article has been rated as Redirect-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy. See also the Eastern Christianity Portal. (with unknown importance)
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on the Oriental Orthodox Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Redirect This article has been rated as Redirect-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

[edit] Why is this here?

How is this article about the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom? It's largely the text of the Divine Liturgy article from OrthodoxWiki, which covers both common Liturgies of the Byzantine Rite and has not been edited to highlight any of the distinctives. They are primarily found in the anaphora, but the text has been retained that talks about both of them. Is there some reason why this article was added that makes it more desirable than to improve Divine Liturgy, which could always use the help? TCC (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I would support merging the two. This article has some useful information in it that could be added to the Divine Liturgy article--but it does have some rather strange terminology: "Rites of Entrance," "Rites of Proclamation," etc. Sounds kind of like modernist/trendy western liturgics to me. This could probably be cleaned up and useful information transferred over. I feel the outline in the Divine Liturgy article is useful and should be retained under its own heading. Also, if anyone is knowledgable in that area, it could probably use a MishaPan 05:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
I agree that the articles should be merged. Majoreditor 13:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, certainly merge if there's anything useful here. TCC (talk) (contribs) 21:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Can we merge and delete yet? InfernoXV 15:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
What is there to be merged? I confess also to doubts as to whether the editors responsible for the content actually consulted anything in the "Bibliographical resources" section for the most part. TCC (talk) (contribs) 21:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
And when did that Oriental Orthodox project template show up here? They don't use this liturgy, do they? TCC (talk) (contribs) 21:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I vote for outright deletion really. The chap who started the page is one of the servers in the picture, which makes this obviously a vanity edit of sorts. InfernoXV 03:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

hey! How did you know that i was in the picture! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.212.170 (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

When the name of the picture is Image:Me in church with bishop.jpg, one tends to assume that "me" is the uploader.
I'm very sorry to have heard about Fr. Pavlo. Memory eternal! TCC (talk) (contribs) 05:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Indeed, he was remembered among the newly-departed at the Greek-Catholic Divine Liturgies here in Singapore on 21st and 23rd September. Вѣчная Память! InfernoXV 08:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)