User talk:Ditta43

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:Lysistrataat DSA.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lysistrataat DSA.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disambiguation pages

Hello. Reading (disambiguation) is what we call a disambiguation page. As Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) says, "Disambiguation pages are solely intended to allow users to choose among several Wikipedia articles, usually when a user searches for an ambiguous term." For that reason, "The description associated with a link should be kept to a minimum, just sufficient to allow the reader to find the correct link." That's why I removed your elaboration on how good the University of Reading is, even though it is arguably true. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright issue with Image:Valinakis11.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Valinakis11.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ana-mpa.gr/gr/biogr/valinakis_ioannis.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Valinakis11.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Valinakis11.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:Valinakis11.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:Valinakis11.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:Valinakis11.jpg.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. — mholland (talk) 00:23, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyrights

As per the above message, I have also tagged Image:View of Glyfada.jpg, which is a crop from an image at http://www.vgreece.com/index.php?entry=entry060723-102240. Please note that {{GFDL-self}} is only to be applied to works which you have created yourself. — mholland (talk) 00:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Also:
  • Image:Lysistrataat DSA.jpg
  • Image:Lysistrata.dsa.jpg
  • Image:Debut.JPG
  • Image:Goulandris06.jpg
  • Image:Kalliopi3.jpg
mholland (talk) 00:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Image:Verelis32.jpg
  • Image:Atrium09.jpg
  • Image:Uni-lake.jpeg
mholland (talk) 09:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Sommerk.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sommerk.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — mholland (talk) 09:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Campusview.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Campusview.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — mholland (talk) 10:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Campusview2.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Campusview2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — mholland (talk) 10:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Northampton squ.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Northampton squ.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Shity University, London. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thinboy00 talk/contribs @78, i.e. 00:52, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to De Montfort University. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Groupthink (talk) 03:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Slut, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 22:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Promiscuity, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 22:52, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Ditta43. You left some comments on Gwernol's userpage that I removed because they were misplaced. You really want to aim for the talk page at User talk:Gwernol if you have comments or questions. Joyous! | Talk 23:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


Based on your edits to the articles "Promiscuity" and "Slut", it seems to me that you do not have a neutral point of view regarding Paris Hilton. I recommend that you refrain from editing the article on Paris Hilton. I am trying to make this recommendation in a positive and helpful way. Wanderer57 (talk) 00:03, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

[edit] Editing Wikipedia

Hi Ditta43:

I am going to try to explain something. I don't know if you know this. Maybe this will help.

If you think someone is a crook or a pornstar or whatever, you cannot edit Wikipedia and put in your opinion of that person.

Even if you are "really really" sure, you still can't.

The content of Wikipedia articles is not about your opinion or mine.

Edits to Wikipedia have to be based on reliable sources. WP:Reliable

That applies to all edits, but it is particularly important in articles about living persons. WP:BLP

I hope this is some help. If you have questions about this you can ask me or ask the WP:Helpdesk. Wanderer57 (talk) 00:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)