Talk:Dinorah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article falls within the scope of the Opera WikiProject, a collaboration to develop Wikipedia articles on operas and opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project talk page is a place to discuss issues, identify areas of neglect and exchange ideas. New members are very welcome!
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.

[edit] Name of the opera

Both Oxford and Grove list this as Dinorah, ou Le pardon de Ploërmel. Is there any reason why we shouldn't as well? Best.--Kleinzach (talk) 01:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

  • No objection. Should it have the comma or not? Be bold. Go ahead and move it. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 01:34, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your understanding. I've tried to clarify the confusion about this in the text. Le pardon de Ploërmel was in fact the first name of the work under which it was premiered, but it is now almost universally known as Dinorah. And yes, the comma should be correct.

Are you an admin? Unfortunately it's not possibly now to move the article back to Dinorah which is a redirect. (We don't use long opera titles on WP, BTW).--Kleinzach (talk) 02:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. --Kleinzach (talk) 08:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)