User talk:Dil tarasha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, i have been editing the tanoli section here on wikipedia but when ever i bring it to a presentable state, someone undoes it. If you are doing this, tell me what your concerns are and we can correct the page together but dont just undo others contributions, cheers.

Hello, thanks for the reply, isnt there any way we can stop these idiots from vandalising the tanoli page. Anyways you wrote to me : 'But to hi jump us into pathans is wrong and haraam. I dont know what your view point is, but you seem to support a view that no book, literary or real source would accept or concede. Show me proof and quotes then we'll talk, otherwise stay away from vandalsing the page. Good day.--Dil tarasha (talk) 12:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wikitanoli"

If you dont know what my view point is then why have you written 'you seem to support a view that no book, literary or real source would accept or concede.' Im not interested in pathan or mughal origin debates here nor do i want to be part to this argument beacuse I am proud to be a tanoli and i refer to myself as only tanoli, not mughal or pathan. I just want this tanoli page to look presentable because it is very messed up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikitanoli (talk • contribs) 05:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Tanoli

An editor has nominated Tanoli, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanoli and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)