Talk:Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indian cinema, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Indian cinema. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
More information about this article... ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (nations and regions): Indian cinema task force

I DON'T THINK THAAT DDLLJ's PLOT likens thta of the the sure thing absolutely no link no relation its original and the plot of DDLJ is of a third-world country whereas the other of a developed so drop this judgement up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.251.65.187 (talk) 15:33, 2 September 2007 (UTC) more care for this brand wikistaff it's a shame —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.251.71.196 (talk) 10:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Contents 1 Sources? 2 Bit added at top -- keep it or not? 3 Revised synopsis again 4 Picture, dinner party

[edit] Sources?

I added some context that I think is pretty obvious from watching the film, so it's verifiable in that sense, but it would be better if some sources could be found supporting it. Any ideas for sources? Discussions of Hindi film and how they have been changing would be great. - Taxman ^Talk 15:06, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Well, I just want to point out... the film itself can be a source... and I think in some senses it might be the best (not for analysis, for fact). Beyond that, Planet Bollywood has some useful information. gren グレン 16:28, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Um, I copyedited the additions, and removed the bit re Kajol's revealing outfits. Bollywood heroines were cavorting in revealing Western outfits long before DDLJ. I agree with the thesis re fresh elements and also don't know where to source it. Zora 20:06, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bit added at top -- keep it or not?

An anon added some material in the synopsis that wasn't about the plot. I moved it to the top and copyedited it. I'm still not sure that it's useful or needed, so would appreciate input from other editors. Zora 06:41, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Too much original research. If an important review or something can be found saying that then fine, but otherwise it's not too valuable. - Taxman ^Talk 12:55, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Revised synopsis again

Someone had turned the synopsis into one long breathless paragraph in sub-standard English. I edited for style again. Zora 07:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

isnt this a film over 3 hours long, how can one add it to such a category?

[edit] Picture, dinner party

Devilitself, there's no need to repeat the picture shown at the top later in the article, with a caption that is speculation at best. Also, I removed most of the detail from the material you added re the dinner party in Mumbai. That is just too ephemeral to deserve space in an encyclopedia. It also needs a reference. Zora 10:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Smartsarang 06:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC) There was some major spelling mistake in the urdu script or words were written in reverse order carelessly. I have rectified that. You can check the spellings.