User talk:Dijxtra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. I will respond here unless you request otherwise. Thank you.


Archive
Archives
  1. July 2005 – December 2005
  2. January 2006 – April 2006
  3. May 2006 – August 2006
  4. September 2006 – June 2007

Contents

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Miso_Kovac.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Miso_Kovac.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Videmus Omnia 14:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Debate on the correct adjective for Kosovo

Hi! Based on your interest in the Balkans, you may be interested in the currently ongoing debate on whether we should be using Kosovo or Kosovar/Kosovan as the adjective for Kosovo. —Nightstallion 15:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:Bregovic Redzic Bebek 2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bregovic Redzic Bebek 2005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:Bregovic Islamovic 2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bregovic Islamovic 2005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unfair image

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Bregovic Islamovic 2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bregovic Islamovic 2005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ➪HiDrNick! 05:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Dubrovnik

Bok!

Molio bih te da podržiš moj zahtjev za preimenovanje Republic of Ragusa u Republic of Dubrovnik na en.wiki kao i na ostalim koje nisu talijanske.

Anto

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Gornji_grad_medvescak_map.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Gornji_grad_medvescak_map.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 16:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Gornja_dubrava_map.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Gornja_dubrava_map.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 16:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect

You initially posted the page Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect. There is a discussion at its talk page that you may want to participate in. -- Jreferee t/c 22:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Featured List of the Day Experiment

There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 01:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Sinjska alka

Sinjska alka was deleted as a broken redirect under WP:CSD#R1. It pointed to Alka. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Third Wave

Hi, (hope I'm doing this right) I noticed you re-referenced the dates of the Third Wave experiment as 1969. I went to Cubberley during all this, and the Third Wave experiment was in April, 1967. I wasn't in Jones class myself, but I was a photojournalist at the time. I've posted the references to my website www.cubberleycatamount.com with scans from the original articles from the original student paper at Cubberley. I tried to reference these in the wiki article, but I'm not sure if I've got them referenced correctly or not - maybe you can help me fix it up properly, assuming it looks OK to you. There have been a number of articles after this time which have gotten the timeframe wrong, but these dates are confirmed both in the Catamount and in "Hassling", by Sylvia Berry Williams. Jones had left Cubberley (fired and/or resigned - he was supposedly offered another job in the district, but declined it) by June of 1969. Jones did a "United Student Movement" simulation/experiment in December 1967, and an Apartheid "experiment" in 1968 (using the color of hair or eyes or something like that as the discriminator). I hope this is how I'm supposed to communicate one-on-one... if not, sorry(!) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meadowvistan1984 (talk • contribs) 05:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Excellent! Thank you for pointing this out, I fixed the error and will take some time to expand the article with references you provided. Thank you very much for this input, and welcome to Wikipedia! --Dijxtra 13:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Croatian gov

HDZ also has 67 - it signed a coalition contract with the minority representative from the Mreza romskih udruga. --PaxEquilibrium 09:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but the only problem is that minority representative is not 100% sure to enter the parilament :-) See here: [1]. --Dijxtra 09:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Lol, didn't see that. ;) --PaxEquilibrium 11:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mayors of Zagreb

I found out you excluded Granić and several others from the Mayors of Zagreb category. I also don't think they should be considered real mayors, but I put them in the category because they were in the List of mayors of Zagreb. Could you delete them from that article to avoid additional confusion or set up a seperate list for mayor nominees who failed to become mayors? Thanks. Admiral Norton (talk) 20:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I removed them from the list and pointed to the Zagreb Crisis article which mentions all of those candidates for mayor. --Dijxtra 20:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
OK thanks Admiral Norton (talk) 21:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
These articles have to go somewhere, so I put them in their own category - Category:Zagreb Crisis mayors. Admiral Norton (talk) 22:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I moved the category to Category:Zagreb Crisis mayor nominees, this would be more precise. --Dijxtra (talk) 22:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Happy New Year

...and all the best in the new one!!! --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 00:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Donja dubrava map.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Donja dubrava map.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Donji grad map.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Donji grad map.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pozdrav

Baci pogled ovdje. Članci su katastrofa, najradije bih sve predložio za brisanje.

Btw. postoje karte zagrebačkih gradskih četvrti na commonsima, tako da ove na en ne trebaju više. Pozdrav --Suradnik13 (talk) 13:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

O, bogek, bogek, ovaj momak se baš raspisao o obavještajnim agencijama... pogledat ću da li se da išta učiniti oko tih članaka pa ću popričati sa tim momkom...
E, a šta se tiče gradskih četvrti, to upravo sređujem pa ću pobrisat ove slike koje sam pokrao sa zagreb.hr :-) --Dijxtra (talk) 12:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Dovoljno je pogledat naslov članka Obavestajna Bezbednostna Sluzba, a o sadržaju da i ne govorim. Maltene nam službe ne proganjaju srbe i muslimane, te hrvatsku emigraciju. Pozabavio bih se time ovdje, ali trenutno nemam vremena. Napisao sam članak na hr:wiki, vjerojatno ce ti pomoc. Hvala ti. Pozdrav --Suradnik13 (talk) 12:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Je, vidim da je stanje katastrofalno. Probat ću to uredit danas do neke normalne mjere... Hvala što si mi svrnuo pažnju na to ;-) --Dijxtra (talk) 12:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cheers

Glad to see you are back indeed! Asteriontalk 21:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect

Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

[edit] Serb propaganda

D, could you please check out the Serb propaganda article, Wikipedia:Coatrack and Wikipedia:Content forking and tell me sincerely what you think? Cheers. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 23:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Hahahahaha, I just can't believe they really took time to write all that. Now I see why Duja took the hike :-D Sorry, no way am I touching that can of worms. I just don't have the time and enthusiasm to fight with all that brain damage on Wikipedia. If you see somebody breaking 3RR or doing some obvious vandalism, just drop me a note and I'll nail the guy, but I just don't wish to fight hordes of lunatic ultranationalists anymore. Sorry. --Dijxtra (talk) 23:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
OK. I just wanted to hear your opinion, to make sure mine isn't wrong. ;) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 12:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Just to say hello and to remind you all that Big Brother is watching :-)... Yep, I'm profoundly disgusted with much of WP, especially our corner, and I'm not sure if I'll be ever trully back. I saw the article before, as well as its AfD, which it managed to survive, which didn't raise my enthusiasm about the state of affairs whatsoever... My current favorites include Serbia#World War II and the Serbian genocide, blatant misquote of reputable historian Wilkes at Bosniaks#Overview, and I just saw the Obavestajna Bezbednostna Sluzba linked above, which I couldn't resist to purge. I dare not search for further facts.
PS, Pax, I assume you want ['ʥuraːʥ]?
Ostajte mi zdravi, mladi & lijepi, & nezarazeni cinizmom. Duja► 12:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Hoh! Hello Duja! :-) Nice to see that you are among us, at least passively ;-) I hope you'll join us some day again and then we can jointly ignore 90% of Balkans related excrement sometimes referred to as "articles". --Dijxtra (talk) 16:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] IPA

I know that Duja is skilled in this, but since he's out, what is your experience in IPA?

I need it for Djuradj II article. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 14:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for disappointing you again, but I don't have a clue about IPA. But, Fran could help you out, he's a linguist and has some basic knowledge of Bosnian. --Dijxtra (talk) 18:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
OK, thanks.
Na, you'll never be able to disappoint me, nor probably anyone. ;) All the best. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 21:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:10 dinara.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10 dinara.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Basic logic gates

A tag has been placed on Template:Basic logic gates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tuđman request move

Hi

Can you help me with this discussion? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Franjo_Tu%C4%91man#Discussion

--Anto (talk) 16:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Names of Zagreb neighborhoods

I came across some Zagreb city district articles and I noticed some items in neighborhood lists unknown to me, e.g. "Stjepan Radić" and "August Cesarec" in Gornji Grad - Medveščak. I grew up in that city district but I'm still unfamiliar with both of these names. Could you please tell me what do these names represent and why are they surrounded by quotes? Admiral Norton (talk) 14:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:20000 dinara.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:20000 dinara.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

  • Image:Ante Marković.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Tifa Sarajevo 2005.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Tifa Sarajevo 2005.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? mattbr 15:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bregovic Redzic Bebek 2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bregovic Redzic Bebek 2005.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Vlado Gotovac

Hi

I'd like you to give your opinion here about the request move:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vladimir_Gotovac#Requested_move --Anto (talk) 16:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] personal question

Are you related to the Škorić (Nikola also ?? - I don't remember), who was in the Linguistics Department, School of Philosophy, U of Z, in the 60s? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.29.169.227 (talk) 21:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)