Talk:Digi-Sign

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on January 16, 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	Companies Portal This article is within the scope of Companies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of companies. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the assessment scale.

hi there,

Having researched this encyclopedia, I find VeriSign, Entrrust and RSA listed with references to their company, service, etc. Under irish companies I also find several organisations in the software category, similar to ourselves.

This is my first submission session (just signed up today) and I'm happy to abide by whatever rules or guidelines you tell me to (I have studied them and thought I was going in the right direction, but clearly not :-(.

Anyhow, we are not in the business of spamming or adding spurious links to others for the sake of 'gaining favour' or whatever, we merely wish to make nots of several significant advances we have made and the fact obviously that we exist, namely:

We pioneered the introduction of ISO 27001 combined with the implementation of a PKI Trust Centre. This was back in 2004, VeriSign only introduced a similar service in 2006.

After thirteen years, we've solved the issue of SSL life cycle management and we've patented it - surely this is information that would interest your readers.

Then theres the fact that there's probably less than a dozen National ID Cards in the world that use the advanced security offered by PKI and we've implemented the rist one ever in the Middle East, again: surely this is information that would interest your readers.

Please tell me what you want me to do, but please don;t simply disregard our entry as some spamming fanatic, we're not.

• Although you've been blocked because your user name was promotional (See WP:U), I thought I should reply: Wikipedia is not a place for advertisement or promotion. See WP:SPAM and WP:SOAP. Furthermore, since you're working for that company, you have a clear conflict of interest (I can also tell from your contributions). See WP:COI for details. All of your contributions seemed to be self-promotion and have been reverted by Wikipedia's editors. LightAnkhC|MSG 19:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi there,

Your points are noted and as I do work for the company (I wan't trying to conceal this by the way), I understand the conflict issue and also note your other points. So may I suggest the following:

Remove this/block it until I've had enough time to create a 'non commercial' or self effacing entry and permit me to re-submit it for approval during the course of the next month or so.

As an organisation, we decided in 2007 that we would move to an open source model for our own business and as this is my responsibility, all of what I'm doing at the moment requires a 'steep learning curve' so thank you for your comments and your time, it has been most helpful.

I'll get the hang of this eventually ;-).

Sincerely,

Patrick —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.189.67.90 (talk) 08:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

• Hi, I just rewrote the article a little bit so it fits our neutral point of view policy. You can file a request to be unblocked by logging in to your blocked account and by placing {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your talk page. After you have been unblocked you can edit the article again, of course following our policies WP:COI, WP:NPOV, WP:SPAM and WP:SOAP. I will place this message on your IP's talk page as well :-). Regards LightAnkhC|MSG 10:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)