Talk:Differences between standard Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Languages, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, and easy-to-use resource about languages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
 Archives |
|---|
[edit] NPOV tag
Seeing that all of the sources cited based in the area of influence of the languages in question are Croatian linguists, it's clear that the article as a whole carries a heavy skew with it. I propose that the statements made in the article be revised under the light of input from Serbian and Bosnian linguists. I'm adding a NPOV tag on my (insignificant) discretion. Thoughts? --Acachinero
- I'd say that {{POV-check-section}} for the "outline" section would be a better choice. Personally, I don't think it's terribly POV, but it lacks a lot of context and has Actually, a far more comprehensive outline is at Serbo-Croatian#Present situation. Probably that section (on opinions) should be incorporated there, and instead replaced with a statistic outline, preferrably from 3rd-party (i.e. not ex-Yu) sources. Some material of that kind can be found in Lucic or Greenberg or another Greenberg. Duja► 08:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
