Talk:Die for You (Antique song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is related to the WikiProject Eurovision. This Project is an attempt to enhance, organise, and standardise articles about the Eurovision Song Contest. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Did You Know An entry from Die for You (Antique song) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 15 August 2006.
Wikipedia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Greece, an attempt to expand, improve and standardize the content and structure of articles related to Greece.
If you would like to participate, you can improve Die for You (Antique song), or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles like those on our to do list. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (comments)
Low This article has been rated as a Low priority article

I am not sure whether you are looking for suggestions for a rewrite for this article or the DYK proposition, but there I go:

  1. Why don't you use the fabulous Template:Infobox ESC entry, it makes articles look niftier (and I spent so much time devising it :p ) - you owe it to me after beating me by seconds in posting the first DYK for 11 August!
  2. Antique's result was not the best until Elena won, Sakis was also third, so this is a disputable statement. You also do not mention the fact in the article, so this is a rather shaky nomination.
  3. Terizs' writing three other Greek ESC entries, including the equally successful Sakis song, is probably more relevant here than Agurbash.
  4. This article could use a brushup, but I am currently hating you (and falling flat on my face), so I won't help you with that (there is still some time before it gets DYKed), but I can suggest you a better DYK (remember to include this fact in the article):

Regards, Bravada, talk - 01:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I'll infobox everything one of these days. Trust me, it's on the to-do list. As far as that alternative fact goes, me likey. I'll run the changes now, since it actually makes more sense (and is more accurate to boot) than my original foray. BigHaz 23:12, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] YouTube links

This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally. Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 06:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC)