Talk:Diane Whipple

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Biography     (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] WikiProject Dogs      (Rated Start-Class) Dogs Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it needs. WikiProject LGBT studies     (Rated Start-Class) LGBT Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. Lacrosse WikiProject     (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of the Lacrosse WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the sport of lacrosse. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Contents 1 What is with the cartoon character references? 2 Updated status of murder conviction? 3 The Recent 7/1/07 News On Knoller 4 Zoophilia clarification 5 Knoller and Noel Indulged In Forbidden Fruit 6 WTF 7 Dogs

[edit] What is with the cartoon character references?

Nonsensical, random, uncited...? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.192.215.162 (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Updated status of murder conviction?

The linked articles about the trial indicate that the murder conviction was tossed out on appeal:

In a later development the state attorney general's office filed papers in April 2003 with the 1st District Court of Appeal requesting that Knoller's murder conviction be reinstated. They argued that for a murder charge, the standard in California only requires a defendant to know that their dog could cause serious injury to a person and not necessiarily death. In short, proscecutors still believe that Knoller kew enough about the risks involved in exposing these dogs to the public to warrant a murder conviction. Attorney Dennis Riordan, representing Knoller, will argue that she did not act in conscious disregard for human life - the standard needed for a murder conviction - when she took Bane for a wak to the rooftop to releive himself on the day of the incident. Arguments this latest appeal took place on March 15, 2005 and a written decision will be rendered by appelate judges within 90 days.

Anyone know the result? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BobbyPeru (talk • contribs) 15:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC).

[edit] The Recent 7/1/07 News On Knoller

A woman whose dogs fatally mauled a neighbor could get more prison time, after the California Supreme Court ordered a trial judge to consider convicting her of second-degree murder rather than involuntary manslaughter. 1

Supposedly another Judge will review an sentence her. Jewish groups are rushing to her defense because a case this atrocious, will go down in history. The attack was brought on because the dog nuzzled the girl's crotch, indicating it was aroused, she pushed the monster away, and it exploded.

[edit] Zoophilia clarification

"Allegations were also made that the two committed zoophilia against their dogs..." I assume that this sentence refers to the two attorneys, Noel and Knoller, however as it immediately follows an entry about Schneider and his cellmate, as well as a previous entry concerning an unnamed farmer, the identity of "the two" is somewhat unclear. Schneider and cellie? Schneider and the farmer? Cellie and the farmer? (notwithstanding the improbability of Cornfed and his cellie gaining access to the ill-fated pooches from within the confines of the Pelican Bay SHU) Again, I assume that the attorneys were the alleged zoophiles, but clarification is in order.

[edit] Knoller and Noel Indulged In Forbidden Fruit

A former Pelican Bay guard quoted in Rolling Stone magazine said he saw Noel change. "I'd get on the phone with Bob to ask him about a case," Keith Whitley said, "and all he did was talk about how big Bane's balls were. Noel himself bragged to the magazine about the size of the dog's penis and its erections [1]

The attack occured because Bane had been having intercourse with Knoller. Bane came up to Whipple, nuzzled her crotch, she pushed the dog away, and the dog exploded.

[edit] WTF

Does this have to do with lgbt studies?166.82.201.8 15:37, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dogs

Where they put down? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.69.31.169 (talk) 10:19, 11 September 2007 (UTC)