Talk:Diagnostics of Karma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Book analysis

One cannot write lengthy essays about the content of the book it is called original research, which is inadmissible in wikipedia. Acording to wikipedia policies, reputable third party references are required that evaluate the book. `'Miikka 22:20, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

I cannot call what I wrote "lengthy essays". Neither do I consider neutrally describing a book "original research". I was only trying to give people an accurate idea of what those books are. And I can't think of a better source for this than the books themselves, since I can understand Russian without problems.))

About notability. The author of those books has saved himself thousands of people, and that is an established fact. And indirectly, through those books, he has changed for the better the fates of some millions, believe it or not. If this is not notable enough, than I have no idea of notability.))However, I am not going to try and change the common policies of this resource, which I hold very useful, no matter what might happen to my own contributions.) This being as it is, I will not go through the tedious process of searching for some "reputable third party references", besides what links I have given. I really hold it stupid (no offence meant) in this case of books to refer to someone else, when I am in right mind enough to see what they (the books) are about.

If deletion is the case, so be it. Go ahead, I will not be offended. It was worth the try, anyway.)--Timeastor 07:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)