Talk:Diabolical signature

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should this be merged with Seal of the demons? -- Error

The first paragraph does not make sense. It is the signature of a demon, but Dr. Faustus signed it? Dr. Faustus was not a demon. Did the contract require the signatures of both Dr. Faustus and the demon? Perhaps, but the one who was selling his soul was not the one whose signature was diabolical. (Contrary to what the paragraph seems to imply.) Michael Hardy 23:51, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)

This artical is full of wooly phraseology which is supposed to preserve objectivity but really just damages readability and amounts to repetition and tautology (for example "There are a number of alleged demon signatures in existence, some or all perhaps faked." - "alleged" already imples possibly fakery) I will reorder it and make it more cohesive. --Korona 12:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)