User talk:Di4gram
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
I am willing to be an informal mediator in the case between Di4gram/Warcaptain and Bingolice/Graal unixmad in relation to the GraalOnline article. If you wish for this case to be mediated, please signify your intent by visiting this page. Killfest2 (Talk) 03:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC) |
Contents |
[edit] Mediation response
Sorry but it doesn't matter. Even if you and seven - or even seventy - of your friends all have the same complaints, that still does not make it a verifiable fact. Read through WP:V. Such unverified statements - especially critical and negative ones - can be removed without explanation (although a good edit summary and/or discussion would help - that seems to be the crux of the problem here). —Wknight94 (talk) 05:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Still blocked on GraalOnline
Pardon me, but why is Graal unixmad allowed back on Wikipedia right now? He has still not unbanned me for editing the Wikipedia entry. Di4gram 17:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- That was originally done by Danny (talk • contribs). He would be the better person to ask. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:33, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- It would be, if he had answered his phone/responded to my emails in the last 3 days. Killfest2—Daniel.Bryant 07:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Deleted GraalOnline article maliciously recreated secretly in german...
[edit] Deleted GraalOnline article maliciously recreated secretly in german...
The GraalOnline article that was deleted due to WP:WEB, NPOV, and other issues noted in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GraalOnline has been secretly reposted at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graal_Online , with little to no changes except for the language translation... The English page was nearly unanimously voted for removal and barring any significant changes should not be allowed back in any language... Vipercat (talk) 22:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
