Talk:Dhillon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
This article is part of WikiProject Pakistan which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan and Pakistan-related topics. For guidelines see WikiProject Pakistan and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Malicious edits by user JohnnyZee

User JohnnyZee removed an entire length of folk lore and legend regarding the Dhillon name because he objected to one line, which suggested that Delhi was named after King Dhilu. The veracity of that statement is beyond me, but he should at least observe that this same statement appears in the article about Delhi as well. Moreover, he removed the fascinating bit about the lineage tracing back to the times of the Mahabharata, but left in what was clearly a piece of vandalism: someone had written the line "Yesterday I went to Dhillon video and ordered the movie 'Kachi'". It's not clear to me that JohnnyZee has the best intentions in mind when it comes to this article.

Jesse.

[edit] Ban and block on user JohnnyZee

Constant vanadalism and orginal research. Must be blocked--Indian50 01:32, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vanadalism etc.

As a Dhillon, I have every interest in having this page be historically accurate. To consider what I edit to be vandalism is inappropriate. Because I didn't see the line about Dhillon Video & Kuchi, doesn't mean I accept the content, it means I didn't notice it. I have other things to do, as we all do. I can't be on this website 24/7 to monitor the page. To say I am a vandal because I didn't remove content is ridiculous. Why didn't India50 remove the content the day it came up? Also, to include content because it is interesting or because it is folklore isn't valid in my eyes. Include a "folklore" section if you want to include information that has no historic proof. Most of us accessing this page are proud Dhillons, and if others are trying to learn about our stature and greatness, they should be reading accurate information... not bedtime stories.

JohnnyZee 15:57, 11 May 2007 (UTC)