User:DGG/LR
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User:DGG
Librarians' criteria for reliability:
Contents |
[edit] General criteria
- Recognized authority
- Widespread use in relevant places
- Citation in appropriate contexts
- Evaluations by reliable outsiders
- Credentials and reputation of publisher
- Credentials and reputation of authors & editors -- roles
- Controls for quality --peer review, editorial review, subsequent reviews, citations,
- Format and medium: online, print, etc.
- Technical quality
- Interface
- Text
- Illustrations
- Consistency
- Degree of detail
- Freedom from bias
- Currency of information
- Confirmation by other known reliable sources
- Sources given for information
- Reliability of sources
- Appropriateness of sources
- Currency of sources
and above all
-
- Acceptance in context of proposed use
[edit] Specific Types of publications
- Academic journals
- Research
- Reviews
- {Published conferences)
- Magazines
- Academic news magazines
- Professional magazines
- General magazines
- Specialist hobby magazines
- Newspapers (Newspapers as a primary historical source)
- Academic books
- Research monographs
- Standard treatises
- Advanced textbooks
- Standard textbooks
- Popular books
- Web sites
- Specialist web sites
- Specialist academic web sites
- Documents and archives
- Data collections
[edit] Uncertain factors at present
- Reliability and stability of online-only sources
- Accessibility of restricted sources
- Repositories & preprints: arXiv, etc.
- Publishers versions vs database versions (Proquest, Ebsco, etc.)
- Republication: J-Stor
- Aggregators: MUSE
[edit] How does Wikipedia fit in here as a source?
- recognized (within limits)
- reputation
- credentials of authors
- Controls for quality
- Format and medium: online, print, etc.
- Technical quality
- Degree of detail
- Freedom from bias
- Currency of information
- Confirmation by other known reliable sources
- Sources given for information
- Reliability of sources
- Appropriateness of sources
- Currency of sources