Talk:Dexter in the Dark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Literature Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article needs an infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern
	This article is supported by the Crime task force. (with unknown importance)
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Needs Revision and DEpth

While it may seem to those that have only seen the Showtime series as if the concept of the "Dark Passenger" being a spirit of some sort as being poorly written or as a left turn from the series, it has in fact been a common theme throughout the literary series for the protagonist, Dexter to question whether or not his own perception of reality via the dark passenger could be considered clairvoyant and/or as if the Passenger itself where some entity separate from himself. Furthermore the criticism section gives no reference and comes across as the individual who edited has added his own opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.216.40.233 (talk) 21:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

The criticism section has been changed to become almost unreadable, including the following sentence fragment:

"...that although the main plot was a let the the sub plot of Dexter teaching Rita's children is a very interesting..."

I am reverting to the previous edit, but references for the criticism section will eventually need to be added. Jodamn (talk) 00:05, 13 March 2008 (UTC)