User talk:Devilyouknow
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Crocker edits
Your vast gutting of well-referenced and relevant material from an article that has been quite stable is easily seen as not in good faith. Please use the talk page for discussion and consensus before you remove such a large portion of an article. Benjiboi 22:15, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Your accusation of me not acting in good faith is, in fact, not in good faith. As indicated on the article history and the previosu AFD, it seems that anyone you disagree with is labeled as "not acting in good faith." So cut it out and discuss the merits. Devilyouknow 22:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
-
- Very happy to discuss as is evident throughout the history on the article and my involvement in it. I think anyone who looks at my actions will see that I have made every efforts at communicating and quickly addressing concerns to make the article better. Also, I wrote easily seen as not in good faith so I apologize as I didn't mean to accuse you of anything including not acting in good faith but I was trying to express that it was hard for me to see your edits as constructive. You may have some valid points but as other editors before (and after) me have pointed out those edits were too sweeping and doing so without discussion and consensus first seems to violate the collaborative nature of how articles are created and improved. Benjiboi 22:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well then, let's discuss on the talk page, shall we?? Devilyouknow 22:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- I've already responded to you there. Benjiboi 22:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well then, let's discuss on the talk page, shall we?? Devilyouknow 22:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Very happy to discuss as is evident throughout the history on the article and my involvement in it. I think anyone who looks at my actions will see that I have made every efforts at communicating and quickly addressing concerns to make the article better. Also, I wrote easily seen as not in good faith so I apologize as I didn't mean to accuse you of anything including not acting in good faith but I was trying to express that it was hard for me to see your edits as constructive. You may have some valid points but as other editors before (and after) me have pointed out those edits were too sweeping and doing so without discussion and consensus first seems to violate the collaborative nature of how articles are created and improved. Benjiboi 22:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
