User talk:DestradoTensai
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome!
Hello, DestradoTensai, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am CTSWyneken. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
- Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
- Provide an Edit summary
- Take a look at Consensus of standards. It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it. Even then, I typically ask if anyone minds that I make a change. Very often they do! ;-)
- Create a User page
Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. --CTSWyneken 20:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)(talk)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Mcchris.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mcchris.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WP:FILMS Newsletter
The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WP:FILMS Newsletter
The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WP:Films Newsletter
The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 07:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Films February Newsletter
The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 22:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] March WP:FILMS Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 00:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Peer review/Ananthabhadram/archive1
Can you take a look at the article Ananthabhadram put out for a peer review? Aditya Kabir 17:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 21:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 07:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 18:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 03:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Films roll call
An automatic notification by BrownBot 23:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter
The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 22:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] UFC 84
A discussion is happening right now on the fate of UFC 84. Because the outcome of this discussion could affect other MMA event pages and how/when they are created, your input would be greatly appreciated. The discussion is happening here. Thank you for your assistance! Gromlakh (talk) 17:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Snapper2
The reduced abilities section was a result of concerns over the amount of in-universe content in the article that could be detrimental to a GA run. The present abilities section, however, is rather short and could be fleshed out a bit more (see GA Sasuke Uchiha, which has three decent-sized paragraphs). Reader comprehension is as important as avoiding excessive detail. In any case, please assume good faith with his efforts, as a central goal of the past few months has been to cut down on the amount of in-universe content and related cruft that these pages were originally composed of (nothing but it rather), and recently, an attempt at GA status (although the article still needs major cleanup). If you wish to expand the section more, then go ahead, but please avoid excessive detail, be concise, and extraneous details don't need to be included. As for User:Snapper2 himself, I've known him to be a well-meaning and dedicated editor, and the "underhanded" tactics you're accusing him of are unfounded in this regard. If further conflict arises, then discuss the issue with him personally on his talk page, which I see you have not done for this issue and is certainly beneficial to avert future conflicts. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 11:12, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Destrado, in regards to your concern on my talk, I'm neutral on this. The information does appear to be bunk yet I don't see it as excessive. You might need another person's opinion. Sorry I couldn't be of much help. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
I find it difficult to have a discussion with you when you disappear for weeks at a time and, when you do surface, you wait until your next visit to respond to my comments. I do not support the meager length that is Naruto's article, as is evidenced by my bitching about it here. I would fully support lengthening it to something more akin to what can be found in the other members' of Team 7's article. At the moment it is being frowned upon for it to be any longer, so we work with the size we are allowed. As it stands, Spiraling Shuriken is used in only one battle and, under your revision, consists of half the paragraph it is in. Conversely, shadow clones and Rasengan combined take up the other half, with toads seeing no mention whatsoever. I hope you can see the reasoning behind my desire to not have one recent ability far outstrip the abilities that have been around for 200+ chapters. ~SnapperTo 04:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- His fight with Mizuki throws to the wind the concept that his shadow clone numbers have increased. If anything they have regularly decreased since then. As to dividing Rasengan from Naruto's other abilities, that already exists in the article history. It was requested that it be made shorter, so it came to be its current length. ~SnapperTo 04:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Volume 41
Have you checked List of Naruto chapters (Part II)?Tintor2TalkContribs 09:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
According to List of Naruto chapters (Part II) the volume 41 are chapters from 370 to 379. That page is not semiprotected. About Jiraiya, I cant comment about if his death. About that famous interview, it has only appeared in forums and blogs which are not reliable sources.Tintor2TalkContribs 11:38, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Robert Kelly
Thanks for the note, I semi-protected the article for a week, let me know if it starts up again. Dreadstar † 16:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your note about Jiraiya (Naruto). Check out WP:V and WP:RS for more info on sources for article content. Looks like the article is now protected, but let me know if you need further assistance. Dreadstar † 23:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Kishimoto sure likes to leave us hanging doesn't he?
The whole reason that the Jiraiya infighting is going on is because Kishimoto left the Jiraiya plot where it was. I don't like it as much as the next guy, but what can we do about it? It's like the edit war on Jimmy Wales's article about his birthday. Of course Kishimoto could confirm it, but without a decent source it's all OR. Sasuke9031 (talk) 19:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- OK, so it's not Kishimoto that likes to leave us hanging then, but it is the rest of the world. Sure he is dead. Who cares. Wikipedia operates on verifiability, not truth. Sasuke9031 (talk) 21:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] What the... ?
You're right about that. The whole verifiability policy is ludicrous. The fact is it's still policy, and if that makes you want to quit, by all means. I am thinking about doing just that (mostly because my computer is screwing up). Sasuke9031 (talk) 21:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter, March 2008
 |
The Space-Time Telegraph | |
||||
| The WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter | ||||||
| Issue 1 | March 2008 | |||||
For the Doctor Who project, Sceptre (talk) 18:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
||||||
