User talk:DerHexer/archive06
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 archives |
|
|---|---|
| archive1 | archive2 |
| archive3 | archive4 |
| archive5 | |
| barnstars | |
[edit] Welcome
A warm welcome to the English Wikipedia, dear Hexer! If you have questions, please don't ask on my talk page, because I'm not active here. Just ask one of these people. Most of them are happy to help (but only if nobody stole their passwords, of course). :o) We (I don't mean myself very much but rather the community of the English Wikipedia) look forward to your contributions! Have fun! --Thogo (Talk) 22:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sceptre would like to nominate you for adminship!
- No hurry, of course :) Will (talk) 22:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well, okay. It's possible to start the RfA on July 14, before 2 o'clock pm UTC? It would be wunderful 'cause then I'll have vacations. :) Maybe you add some links, e. g. [1] [2], [3] or [4]. I could do this, too, replying to the three "questions for the candidate". Greetings and thanks for your confidence, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ey! Marcus Cyron 14:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well, okay. It's possible to start the RfA on July 14, before 2 o'clock pm UTC? It would be wunderful 'cause then I'll have vacations. :) Maybe you add some links, e. g. [1] [2], [3] or [4]. I could do this, too, replying to the three "questions for the candidate". Greetings and thanks for your confidence, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- I've co-nominated you. Клоун 15:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Maybe it's better if someone else will nominate you here - because here I'm not a "Star" *g*. Nearly nobody knows me and if I nominate you with my horrible english, they maybe laugh but dont give you the voice. So we will wait a longer time until I can nominate someone for adminship here afte at de:WP ;) (for the others: DerHexer is already Administrator e at the german-language-Wikipedia and I had nominate him there for the election). The interesting thing is - Hexer is
- Student
- Wikipedia-Author ("Portal:Latein"/"Portal:Latin")
- Admin who works a lot at the RC at the de:WP
- and here at the RC.
He's a true Wikinator ;). Marcus Cyron 22:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your RfA was successful
Congratulations, your RfA was successful and you are now a sysop! --Deskana (talk) 17:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yay. Well done. Good luck with the tools. The Rambling Man 17:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- :-) Good luck with the tools. Rlest 17:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- good luck with the tools. I hope, you'll still be active on dewiki though.... ;-) --Complex (de) 17:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Happy Admin and a lot of fun with your new tools ;) --C-M ?! 18:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Herzliche Glühstrümpfe und viel Spaß bei der Willkürerei. ;o) --Thogo (Talk) 21:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- I apologize for the harsh words, I was going to change it to Support, but I did not have the time. Happy adminsiip! Tcrow777 talk 08:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- Congrats, and have fun :-) — PDD 10:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Glückwunsch auch von mir. Hau rein! —AldeBaer (c) 10:43, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Ach hätte ich dir doch persönlich gratulieren können... ;). Marcus Cyron 16:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- The nominator was late again for the exact same reasons congratulations :P Will (talk) 21:08, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- - Don't know that we've ever spoken, but I was watching your RfA and am very glad to see you were approved. Congrats! Douglasmtaylor 03:09, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
+1 :) Manecke (de-M) 20:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Yes, yes - I am "a bit" too late. But nevertheless - congratulations from me. There is definitely a lot to do here with the buttons - but don't forget to come back to de:WP from time to time... ;-) --Tobi B. 15:26, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "Vandalism"
It's nice to know editors such as yourself are so good at checking the talk page of the articles they revert before jumping to the immediate conclusion of vandalism... NOT! I hope other editors are better than you at interacting with other users 121.218.198.145 10:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, it's vandalism to remove a lot of sourced content, to remove the Wiki syntax and so on. If you want to change something, feel free to do so but don't botch one's work. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't see how it was vandalism, what the first person put was pure lies about the character, I was simply deleting what was un-true. Maybe you should look into it yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.65.66.194 (talk) 21:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar!
 |
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
| For your incredible and tireless work with deletion, I award you the Working Man's Barnstar. Happy editing! --Agüeybaná 15:12, 30 September 2007 (UTC) |
- Wow, thanks. :) It's not so much fun to click dozens of times to delete mainly unnecessary redirects so that your barnstar is a shot in the arm for me. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 15:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thanks again for the revert. KOS | talk 21:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Super Mario RPG lists
Currently, Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars has two lists pertaining to it (List of characters in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars, and List of locations in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars). User:TTN decided it would be best to merge the lists into the main article and split Smithy Gang into those articles. I recently merged Smithy Gang into the list of chatacters by removing the non-notable characters, and I have asserted that a cameo section in the list of characters is valid, per Wikipedia:Trivia sections and Wikipedia:Handling trivia that uses Alex Trebek#Cameos as a good example. I have suggested that we rename the articles per Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting potentially controversial moves to something along the lines of Characters of Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars and World of Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars or Mushroom Kingdom (Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars) just like Characters of Final Fantasy VIII and World of Final Fantasy VI or Gaia (Final Fantasy VII). I believe if these articles are to evolve beyond a non-notable list, they should be renamed. For example, List of Final Fantasy VII locations was merged into Gaia (Final Fantasy VII), because a World article is notable, but a simple list of locations is not. That is why there are other secions of the article to make it a World article. It simply has not been renamed yet.
TTN believes the citations in the development and reception sections of the list of locations, books and magazines, are trivial sources. When I added that the 3D perspective of the game is reminicent of Equinox to the main article, TTN removed it since my souce was "the opinions of the Nintendo Power player's guide writers". Although it was actually Nintendo Power magazine, I do believe a magazine is a reliable source, and I gave a page from Next Generation Magazine which also said the same thing. In addition, I was surprized that TTN said that it was from the players guide, since he claims to own the players guide for the game. He has not verified this, since I asked him for citations in May, "Could you look in the back of the Player's Guide and tell me what “types” of … Magic? I forgot what they call it in the game … well, anyways, what types of Special Attack or whatever it is (actually, could you find out what it's called?) there are? I remember some vaguely when I owned the guide like “Fire”, “Jump”, “Electricity?”, etc. Could you provide a citation, like the page number with a quote in context?" TTN replied that he was going to "get to it" (User talk:TTN/Archive 5#List of locations in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars). TTN claims the player's guide is "at the bottom of a box that's behind at least five others in a cramped space". Seeing that TTN did not recognize that the page was not from the player's guide when I provided a scan of the page in question from Nintendo Power shocked me. However, I have continued to assume good faith by not questioning TTN's honesty.
Per Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus can change, I have offered five different reasonable, temporary compromises that might integrate my idea with TTN's.
- Go over the list of characters so we can delete non–notable characters
- Rename the articles by following the steps at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting potentially controversial moves.
- Cut down the geography section list of locations by cutting it into the regional maps the adventures use when traveling from one to another. I can get pictures and write the fair use rationals, and someone can cut down the text that has no citation and does not allude to other media.
- Write the concept and creation and reception sections for the list of characters
- Write the concept and creation section for the main article
TTN rejected my compromise because it still keeps the articles. I agreed I would consider a redirect, but Wikipedia:Article size does not allow that, since the list of locations is currently 82 KB long. Instead, I agreed to help cut down the geography section that is the bulk of the article, but TTN rejected that as well because TTN states, "I am not interested in working on the article in regards to improving it." and "get past this "having sources automatically means that this information is good" mentality." TTN states, "I don't think they have or will ever assert notability." I have replied with, "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so if you don't think the articles will ever assert notability, we cannot yet know this, per Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#I don't like it.
Would you please take a look at Talk:Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars and give us your thoughts? Taric25 01:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Psssst
You around, m'dear? Ariel♥Gold 10:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- No. :P Have a look at my contribs. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 10:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- I did, lol, but it had been a whole minute and you know, you might be gone! LOL. Hey dear, would you drop a full protection on User:ArielGold/Identity please? Just for safety
Ariel♥Gold 10:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Done. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you dear! You're the only one I know up at this time of day, and it just occurred to me that having that fully protected would be a very wise thing, lol. Thanks, as always, for being here! Ariel♥Gold 10:42, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- /me goes red in the face. ;) … Well, if my semester starts again I won't be able to take so much part in. But have a look at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, yeah I know about that, I just didn't really want to bother anyone over there for a silly thing like this, lol. Thanks again, and I'm off to bed soon! Ariel♥Gold 11:04, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, while you're around, I have a quick question, what's your opinion of this username: User talk:Formication. They submitted an AFC request, for a band (non-notable) with the same name, but it seems to me that this is just so easily read as "Fornication" that it may be problematic. What's your opinion on it? Ariel♥Gold 11:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- I think we should assume good faith. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, while you're around, I have a quick question, what's your opinion of this username: User talk:Formication. They submitted an AFC request, for a band (non-notable) with the same name, but it seems to me that this is just so easily read as "Fornication" that it may be problematic. What's your opinion on it? Ariel♥Gold 11:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, yeah I know about that, I just didn't really want to bother anyone over there for a silly thing like this, lol. Thanks again, and I'm off to bed soon! Ariel♥Gold 11:04, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- /me goes red in the face. ;) … Well, if my semester starts again I won't be able to take so much part in. But have a look at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you dear! You're the only one I know up at this time of day, and it just occurred to me that having that fully protected would be a very wise thing, lol. Thanks, as always, for being here! Ariel♥Gold 10:42, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Done. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- I did, lol, but it had been a whole minute and you know, you might be gone! LOL. Hey dear, would you drop a full protection on User:ArielGold/Identity please? Just for safety
[edit] Please MUCHO HELPO
Please unban my amigo username "willymatt" he is mucho inicento of all his crimeos. And your woman is mine fool.... Jmbozaho 16:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
LOL, thanks for reverting the vandalism done to my userpage. Rosa 22:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Talk:Girl
Nobody has bothered the question I put at the bottom of Talk:Girl. Do you have any suggestions?? Georgia guy 21:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] just a note to say
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
 |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| amazing determination and perseverance johnmark† 21:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Ay!
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| You have beaten me to vandalism like a dozen times today! (: Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 22:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC) |
- Hey, thanks. Don't worry—every single edit is important. :) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Congratulations
on your 40,000th edit on English Wikipedia and 1,000 edits in only 2 days! NHRHS2010 Talk 21:57, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- So many yet? Didn't know that. Thanks for the congrats, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page and blocking the vandal. NHRHS2010 Talk 22:42, 2 October 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Alchemic Dream
The IP was removing unsourced negative content which was totally inappropriate to be in the article. I have been forced to protect the article as a response to an OTRS ticket from the company who are protesting your decision to block the IP () and revert the material back in. Although the article's now locked (and therefore no real need to block the IP address), I felt I should leave you a courtesy note as to what I have done...well, out of courtesy :) Cheers, Daniel 02:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for you information. I got an email, too. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 09:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Commons query
Hi - just thought I'd let you know that some of the links you gave in the vote on Commons now go to deleted pages. I have asked why but thought you might like to know, regards --Herby talk thyme 14:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- I've answered you there. It took a long time because I hate mudslingings. -.- Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed and it's withdrawn now anyway. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 17:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Just curious, but how is editing the sandbox vandalism?
Isn't that kinda the point?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.94.186.187 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 20:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Good question. Same story with deleting a discussion when it is finished and resolved. What is wrong with deleting it? How the heck is THAT vandalism. You guys really don't want contributions. Hours of research and taking the time to find citations, etc. are just deleted for no reason. I contribute to other websites. I am not going to make any more contributions here. It's a waste of time. You folks are a trip.
[edit] Cut and Paste
Please do not copy and paste content. Have a look at Wikipedia:Copyrights, WP:Move and WP:MOVE. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- What are you talking about?Michael DoroshTalk 21:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bob Edwards
If you're going to message me, do me the courtesy of telling me what you're talking about.
"Bob Edwards" is a common name, I created a disambiguation page there and moved the existing content to a new page. This is not "cutting and pasting". Thanks.Michael DoroshTalk 21:17, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- You've copied the content of Bob Edwards to Robert Alan Edwards. That's a copyright violation. Please move the article and afterwards start a disambiguation. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion of the redirect
DerHexer, you've deleted the redirect (it was Talk:House of Gradić, I've restored it in the meantime), without reading the content of the talkpage (Talk:House of Gradić).
If you haven't read, I'll repeat it for you. Here's the content from the library of HAZU.
Here're the instructions how to get to the search results (after a period of time, search result expires, so you need to restart the search).
Step 1. Catalogue start page [5].
Step 2. Catalogue search page [6].
Step 3. Under the author, type "Gradić".
See the first result. Here's the page [7].
Libarze od dievstva i dievickoga bitya v komse tomace sua kolika poglauita miesta staroga i nouoga sakona, koia od dieustua gouore i ono scto sueti naucitegli u mnosieh librieh pisciu ; Libarze velle duhovno i bogogliubno od molitve i contemplanya, sniekiem napomenam duhouniem, oniem ki xele duhouno xiuieti, uelle potrebno i korisno / [dum Basilio Gradich]. - In Venetia : Appresso Domenico, & Gio. Battista Guerra, fratelli, 1567. - 185, [7], 90 str., [1] list ; m8° (15 cm).
Why do you delete redirects that are important? Please, don't mess into something, if you don't understand or don't have any knowledge about the matter. Sincerely, Kubura 08:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- I've just deleted an unnecessary redirect—its article page was a redirect, too, and nothing linked to the talk page. … I even made it easier to move the article back deleting the redirect. What's the problem with it? —DerHexer (Talk) 10:19, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism warning
Hey Dex...you posted a vandalism warning to User:69.182.92.124...problem: it's a public portal here in the States, and you've probably given a warning to about a half a million people, most of whom (like me) haven't the slightest knowledge of, nor interest in, Islamic architecture. Think before hitting ENTER! Just a heads up...not the same --69.182.92.124 13:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
I agree, the next time you tell me a piece of crap like that, I will find where you live and personally beat the sh crap out of you.
[edit] Yet another boring "Thank you!"
... for catching the dreary, petty, unimaginative vandalism to my userpage. --Orange Mike 14:40, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Duh
Before sending out nasty little messages, check your facts. All the text was placed in the archive. Cheers. 199.200.243.253 16:27, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please use the edit summary so that it doesn't look like vandalism. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
204.100.182.192
This ip address belongs to the murrieta valley unified school district. It is very highly unlikely any messages left for this account will ever reach the intended person.
--204.100.182.192 17:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
And don't leave warnings, just ask for the ip to be banned.
[edit] Beating Me
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| You have been beating me to all the vandalism today!! Shawnpoo 21:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC) |
- :( But I'll be in Leipzig for the next three days so that it won't happen again. ;) Thanks for the barn star! :) —DerHexer (Talk) 21:27, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism #2
I wanted to let you know that this user you recently blocked, User talk:207.157.181.40, claimed in his request for an unblock that he was me using an IP address so he wouldn't get in trouble. I've been informed of this by User:Yankees10 and I wanted to let you know this is totally untrue. Should a checkuser be performed or something or will it just be ignored since it's obviously not me? I just don't wanna catch any heat for it, that's all. Thanks.►Chris NelsonHolla! 23:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- A checkuser is in favour of establishing the identity, not vice versa. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Deleting of the unnecessary redirects
- Wow, rocket power. ^_^ JuJube 21:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] October, 2007 (-:
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, constructive edits are not considered vandalism and are not reverted. If you continue in this manner you will be awarded for editing without further warning. Please do not stop, and keep improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.
|
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
| Incredible job deleting all those bad pages. Just had to do that above! (: Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 21:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC) |
- I certainly endorse that. Great work. --Agüeybaná 21:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, thanks. But it makes me a bit tired confirming every deletion. … Instead I wanted to fight a bit vandalism later on. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Totally Confused re: Editing Process (See Ska Page)
I'm sorry, there is something I am not getting. I edited the ska page, it was a constant fight with Upsetterfc. You had indicated that I needed to put citations so I did. A TON of them. Still an editing war with Upsetterfc. He kept deleting everything I contributed so I gave up. Fine problem solved situation resolved. I decided to make no more contributions to pages where he is involved. So then I edited the Talk page since the situation had been resolved and you accused me of vandalism. I had asked a questin about it and never got a response. So, I edited the Talk page again with an explanation and now Skylab has reversed it.
This is TOTALLY confusing. You delete what I want to add and you keep adding what I want to delete. I just don't get it. On the one hand, pages on here ask for contributions. When contributions are made it's such a hassle it doesn't seem to be worth the bother. It's almost like certain people own certain pages here and no one else is allowed to make any changes.
I put this on Skylab's page as well. Please clarify.
69.158.112.194 14:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] {{unblock|your reason here}}
Hi, I would like to know why is the talk page here protected even though you tell them if they want an unblock they need to add the template? Now, because it is semi-protected, the IP cannot request unprotection. Do you have any other ideas? I'm not trying to defend that IP or anything, in fact, I'm neutral, despite the fact that I attend SFUSD...Goodshoped35110s 00:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's a preset template which adds the advice to request an unblock. … I think it's better to ask Can't sleep, clown will eat me why he protected the page for an indefinite duration. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 08:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Apology for F-22 vandalism
I just wanted to apologize for the vandalism, it was an unfortunate mistake I made (I'm not too familiar with wikipedia's features). Once again I scincerely apologize. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MFpart (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 21:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- Note: MFPart has not ceased in his vandalism.--LWF 21:48, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] huds601 Page
Can you please leave my page alone, even if it is vadalised. thanks, Huds601 22:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I'll try it. But I can't promise to keep every special thing in mind. I hope you won't mind, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks #2
Someone vandalized my Userspace! 
But a little angel came along and fixed it! 
Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Nburden 22:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vandal fighting
Man, you're fast! :) Corvus cornix 22:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hehe, you should thank CryptoDerk and Henna, PDD and my informatics' teacher or de.selfhtml.org. :) Btw. User:Oxymoron83/twinklewarnauto.js combines AzaToth's reversion script with my automatically increasing warning script. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm too Luddite to use all these newfangled bots and helper programs. :) Corvus cornix 22:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] You know?
Do you know why that vandal is stalking The JPS so much? --əˈnongahy ♫Look What I've Done!♫ 23:32, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- No. Do you know why? —DerHexer (Talk) 23:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Nope. I find it very surprising that people who find the time to do that exist. --əˈnongahy ♫Look What I've Done!♫ 23:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you for taking action again 59.95.115.214
Thank you. 59.95.115.214 was vandalizing Parwar for no clear reason. It appears that he was equating Paramara with Parwar, which are two distinct groups in spite of similar names .--Malaiya 00:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My recent RfA
I am sorry you felt it necessary to oppose my recent RfA, which did not succeed. I also am sorry you felt it necessary to oppose without leaving me any feedback as to what I should do to improve. I see you reverting vandalism all the time, and I respect your judgment. It saddens me that you would choose to oppose my RfA, and even without leaving me any reason or what I needed to improve on. I will attempt to get more experience in the main namespace and the Wikipedia namespace and will try again for RfA in two month's time. I hope I will have satisfied your concerns by then, but if not, please comment as you feel you should. Thanks for participating in my RfA. -- Cobi(t|c|b|cn) 08:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I changed my position after the "deadline". It was to late for me to write a huge comment—you also know that English is not my first language. For that reason I wanted to talk to you per IRC (which is easier for me), do you remember? … To make it short—imho it was too early and you've "wanted it too much". The next time I'll support it—I promise. If I'm allowed to I could even co-nominate it. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:44, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Just want to ask
How do you guys block people so quickly? I gave someone a final warning and a few minutes later you blocked them. Do you get alerts when a vandalism 4 template is added? NyyDave 18:49, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm watching WP:AIV per WP:VF and block using my monobook. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Eh, pretty cool stuff there. Thanks for letting me know. NyyDave 18:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for the usernameblocked message...
...here. Someone walked up behind me between when I blocked the account and when I was leaving the block message. —Wknight94 (talk) 19:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- lol, I thought I made the block. Sorry for the edit conflict! Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Valley Forge General Hospital
Hello, I am the one who erased part of the section in Valley Forge General Hospital. I would have appreciated if you actually read the deleted portion before you undid my edit. It is completely unsuitable for Wikipedia or any informational website.
- Many parts read as a trivia section ("The famous actor, Gene Wilder, was a neuropsychiatric technician at Valley Forge General Hospital in the late 1950s.").
-There are absolutely no references anywhere in the section, and many statements are opinions or are completely unverifiable ("As a result, they rented housing in Phoenixville, Norristown, Pottstown and virtually all of the other local communities. Many of the personnel joined local groups."). What local groups? How can we verify this? Also ("It was a huge loss to the military, and to the local community.") This is most certainly an opinion, and has NO facts to back it up. This hospital was the subject of the US Supreme Court case "Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United" (1982) where it was decided that the hospital could be liquidated as UNNEEDED SURPLUS PROPERTY and only a few years later was reopened as a fully accredited college. I would hardly call the sale of surplus property via a Public Benefit Allowance a "huge loss", especially when there are absolutely no citations showing that there was any kind of financial or sociopolitical loss.
-The section is full of weasel-worded statements ("Many new medications were first utilized there, and many treatment techniques were developed there").
- At least one sentence is written in the first person ("It was intense, and very, very comprehensive. That training enabled graduates to challenge the R.N. boards after I left the Army.")
- Many sentences make no logical sense and have no documentation to back them up ("The Acrylic Eye (for people who had lost an eyeball) was invented by one of the DENTISTS at Valley Forge") (my emphasis on 'dentist' - why would a dentist be involved in opthamological research?)
- Many sentences have no relevance to the overall topic whatsoever ("Many of the married enlisted personnel also joined local volunteer fire departments, where that training paid off.") I cannot see how married enlisted men joining local fire departments has ANYTHING to do with the topic.
- And please read the last four lines of the section: "There were also 20 people who died of the plague in this hospital.
Please note, whoever stated that about 20 people died of the plague at this hospital, is telling bald faced lies. Not one case of plague was ever contracted at Valley Forge General Hospital. That is one of the problems with Wikipedia, anyone can write anything, whether it is true or not."
This entire section was a joke. No amount of research could possibly verify half of these claims. Since the section is so impertinent to the article itself, I think it was a much better idea to delete the section. While I realize you like to think of yourself as the vandalism police, it's worth taking a closer look next time.
Thanks, Matt
- Please use therefor the edit summary. But first discuss your deletions at the talk page. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "unnecessary redirect"
Are you sure all of those are unnecessary? If so, why? – Gurch 22:40, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Their namespace 0 pages are redirects, too, and they are orphaned. Imho they're all unnecessary. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm. Unnecessary perhaps... though surely such redirects are created all the time when pages are moved; is it really worth the trouble/extra DB load of deleting them all? Oh, and one or other of your reverting and deleting is clearly being done by a bot. My money's on the reverting, which is lucky for you, because you're not meant to delete things with bots (not that I can talk) – Gurch 22:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- are you sure this discussion is worth the trouble/extra DB load? -- ∂ 23:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's a revertion script which I manually use—have a look at an old version here, and a new one here where you can find my script to delete unnecessary redirects, too(, yes, it's not a bot). I hope you can imagine how funny it is to click ten thousands of times. Btw, it's easier to move pages when the talk page redirect is deleted. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm. Unnecessary perhaps... though surely such redirects are created all the time when pages are moved; is it really worth the trouble/extra DB load of deleting them all? Oh, and one or other of your reverting and deleting is clearly being done by a bot. My money's on the reverting, which is lucky for you, because you're not meant to delete things with bots (not that I can talk) – Gurch 22:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kurdish categories
I'm sure it was just a mistake. No hard feelings here. [8]. --VartanM 03:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] More great anti-vandalism work
I know you have loads of these barnstars, but anyway... Well done!
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Keep up the anti-vandalism work! Thebestkiano 16:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC) |
- Hey, thanks! I'm always glad to get a barnstar. :) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Just Curious..
Hello, I see you and dozens of others busting their arses to knock out vandalism and it seems to be a never ending battle. I've tried to help out myself and have gotten frustrated with it. I'm just wondering has it always been this way? If so Why? Why hasn't Wikipedia gotten stricter on this problem? Why do they continue to let it happen and only offer lame threats like 'Please stop, or we'll tell your mum!' (Not exactly but you get my point.) I don't understand, I think Wikipedia is a wonderful tool in so many ways, yet there are a load of idiots ruining it and it seems those who have the authority to stop it, or at least prevent it leave it up to everyone else. Meanwhile, people who make a gods honest effort to contribute are chastised or red tape makes it damn near impossible. To start with why don't they just ban Anonymous IP's from editing period! You want to edit, sign up! Most of the problem seems to come from IP's anyway, and most of those IPs are teenage school brats. Sorry, I'm new here and just trying to figure out why the powers that be would allow this to go on and often over and over and over again from the same IP groups. Are they willingly letting this valuable tool go to hell on the fast track? I appreciate those who vigilantly go after vandals because I've run out of patience in a very short time so you've earned my respect. Then of course there are those that do more criticizing than they actually do to help contribute anything. If they spent half the time doing instead of complaining they wouldn't have anything to complain about. Thanks for doing your best! --Dp67 | QSO | Sandbox | UBX's 20:10, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] you are such a sweet heart
oh gosh how many barnstars do you have? you must feel pretty good about your self with all of them, huh? you must not have done any sports, huh? but i bet all kinds of people love you and you cool barnstars!! congrats!! well keep up the good work with your barnstars, i hope you get 1000!!! that would be jolly, huh?Psycholgymajor101 20:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks #3
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! AFUSCO 22:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Not a big fan of the above template but thanks for reverting vandalism off my user and user talk pages--AFUSCO 22:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Another thanks
I know your talk page is cluttered with these, but you fixed my user page within seconds. Thanks! Puchiko (talk • contribs • email) 22:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism #3
Hi! I notice that you blocked this User for 1 week for vandalism. That was 10 days ago, and today he's vand'ling Flying_Spaghetti_Monster. Yours was not his first block. I leave it in your hands, have a good one. sNkrSnee | t.p. 01:14, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please report vandals to WP:AIV—I'm not always online. ;) … Btw. the IP stopped so that I didn't block. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 09:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notice of request for deletion of editor DerHexer :)
DerHexer, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:R/EFD#DerHexer and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the editors for deletion template from the top of your userpage; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :). Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 13:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Userpage
Thanks for the userpage. I'm pretty sure that was User:Dslam since his edit summary was a copy of my last warning to him yesterday. -WarthogDemon 18:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 24.23.106.86
I think you should extend 24.23.106.86 block to 48 hours because I had to RV his edits of Apple Juice and Urination that he vandalized. He just used this site for vandalism and did it with all his five edits. I hope you consider it please. Thank You.--Stco23 20:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Are dynamic IPs in US for more than 24 hours? In europe you get a new after at least 24h (or if you reconnect before).. --TheK 20:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it's his first block so that a period of 24 hours might be okay. The next time I'd double the duration. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hide bot edits
If you should happen to know, perhaps you can explain to me why it is that, when I click "hide bot edits", whilst looking at my watchlist, ClueBot refuses to hide? That, and one other bot (though I can't remember which at this moment), will always remain on the list. This puzzles me more than it annoys me, and I would like to find out why. Thanks for your time. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 21:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Not all bots get a bot flag—ClueBot has one so that it hides. Please have a look at WP:BOTS. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hrrrmmmm... thanks for the link, but I'm not sure I am any clearer on the issues involved. Thanks for your response, nonetheless. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 21:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please Explain
I just had to make a new account because you blocked my old one "KELLY CLARKSON NUMBER ONE SINGER" Please explain how it is inapropiate I read some of the reasons usernames can be blocked and one was they are confusing your's is confusing me, I don't know what it means P.S. I don't care that I made this many grammar mistakes on this message--KELLY CLARKSON MY DECEMBER!! 21:31, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hello DerHexer, I decided to be bold, and I wrote a response on this person's talk page about why this username is unacceptable. I hope you don't mind. And yes, I really should do something about trimming my huge watchlist (2200+ items!). --Kyoko 21:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reply to you from Djamo
that was not vandalism since you guys think it was copied and pasted —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djamo (talk • contribs) 21:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my bots user page, its much appreciated! Lloydpick 22:38, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Faster Than a Speeding Bot
Wowie-zowie! Awesome revert time on the most recent Springsteen vandalism. You rock. David in DC 14:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Monobook
Sag mal, gibt es auf en nicht so schöne Monobook-Heferlein wie bei uns auf de? Etwa Admins markieren, oder Automatismen für Löschanträge etc...? Marcus Cyron 15:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- Why don't you talk in English to me? :P Auf Wikipedia:Tools findest du vll. etwas. Wo Admins markiert werden, weiß ich nicht, für Anträge aller Art (und davon gibt's viele auf en: – Überblick, SLA, proposed deletions und LAs) findest du vll. hier das richtige Programm. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- Weil ich mal annehme, du kannst neben englisch, Latein und Altgriechisch auch noch ein wenig Deutsch. Marcus Cyron 00:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New question
How is that vandalism? Who is more important, an obscure athlete or a preeminent scholar and dean?
How do I file a complaint for an illegal accusation of vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.151.180.15 (talk • contribs)
- Please start a disambiguation page and request a new article. … To your second question: Nowhere. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:05, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| message IrishGuy talk 21:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC) |
Everytime I am about to revert something...you've already done it. You're like a WikiNinja. :) IrishGuy talk 21:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Award
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Wow. You are reverting all of the vandalism before anyone else can get there! Amazing. That deserves a barnstar. STORMTRACKER
94 21:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot! —DerHexer (Talk) 21:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- Two barnstars in four minutes. That's a new record :D AngelOfSadness talk 21:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] asking
hi, I`m new vandal fighter. now I see u reverted the vandalism befor me, are u use the special tool to doing this? if u use, plz inteduce it to me. I`m new wikipedian and need to your help. thank a lot man.--Gordafarid 22:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- Have a look at WP:VF and WP:TW. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:16, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- I instal both of them. VF is good, but I didn`t know how to use the TW as well as u use. may I can with TW do the both reveting and warning message in one time? if you have time, help me. regards.--Gordafarid 22:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- No that's not possible with TW—I use a script which I wrote for the admin revert. But Oxymoron83 converted it for non admins. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- ok man! thanks a lot. I use it and if will have problem, asked from u. if u have any job to do, I`m in your wait. goodluck.--Gordafarid 22:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- No that's not possible with TW—I use a script which I wrote for the admin revert. But Oxymoron83 converted it for non admins. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- I instal both of them. VF is good, but I didn`t know how to use the TW as well as u use. may I can with TW do the both reveting and warning message in one time? if you have time, help me. regards.--Gordafarid 22:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Suggestion
Hello, DerHexer. If you block someone because of their username, it's a better idea to put instead of "inappropriate username", try {{UsernameBlocked}} or {{UsernameHardBlocked}} for blatant offenses. Thanks, and happy editing! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 22:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 85.83.0.162
I see that you have warned 85.83.0.162 (talk) not to vandalize the F.C. Copenhagen article. However, he keeps on vandalizing. Can you block him? --Vistor 08:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please report vandals to WP:AIV. I'm not always online! Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 14:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Friendly invite
Hello Derhexer, you are invited to join the Alien Research wiki, a collabrative research project open for research on life in outerspace. All theories and original research is accepted. The sunder king 17:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tach
Wo war denn gleich noch mal die Seite mit den am längsten unrevertierten vandalierten Seiten? Thx --Oxymoron83 18:58, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hier. Du wirst mal wieder nach einer AK gefragt. KOS wäre wohl eine gute Partie, meine (Ko-)Laudatio aber wünschenswert, auch wenn ich momentan für nichts Zeit habe. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Danke. 11./12. November würde ganz gut passen (soweit ich das in Erinnerung habe, find meinen Novemberplan grad nicht ;) ), bis dahin muss ich erst mal viel RL arbeiten . Müsste zu schaffen sein? Auch beim Artikelschreiben auf englisch brauch ich ewig (wenigstens einen will ich fertig haben). --Oxymoron83 20:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. The sunder king 20:46, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hi DerHexer, do you think the laudatio can be ready on Tuesday/Wednesday? :) --Oxymoron83 21:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Sag nur mal kurz ja/nein. Ein nein ist ok. büdde :) --Oxymoron83 21:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Phantom Crystal
I created a page called Phantom crystal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phantom_crystal Would you mind editing it? Thank you! Neptunekh 02:59, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hartkirchen
Hello, please take a look at User:Se kraut (= User:Fleischhacker). --84.61.56.11 15:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ipwnthethe1337noobs
Wow amazing work on all the stuff you have done. I was just wondering if you can unban Poly High School please? I know lots of kids vandalize stuff but there r some student who do good for i t. ipwnthe1337noobs
[edit] Juniata College
Hello, congratulations as to all that you do for the Wikipedia.
Just a quick point as to my recent edit to Juniata College. If you take a look the silly information I deleted, I trust you will see that deletion was merited and not vandalism.
Many thanks, and keep up the fine work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.224.99.102 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 19:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Please use the edit summary why you delete (a lot of) content. Otherwise it looks like vandalism. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Anonymous vandalism
Hi. An IP you blocked for a week (see User talk:209.202.54.238) started vandalizing immediately upon the block expiring. I have now blocked it for a month. There's no point pussyfooting around here, and now that we have soft blocks we won't be hitting any legitimate registered users. Just giving you an update. Cheers! 23skidoo 21:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Apologies
You know when you gave me that information about my edits on Rafik Hariri? I was totally confused back then. I didn't even know anything about this back then. Sorry.--Rory666 01:14, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion of redirects
I noticed that you have deleted an awful lot of redirects as "unnecessary". I was wondering what basis you are using to characterise redirects as "unnecessary". Guettarda 05:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Their namespace 0 pages are redirects, too, and they are orphaned. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 07:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Having never heard of "namespace 0", I have no idea what you are saying. Guettarda 13:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Help:Namespace :) —DerHexer (Talk) 20:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Having never heard of "namespace 0", I have no idea what you are saying. Guettarda 13:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Why did you delete Sugarcane?
Hi. I would like to know why did you delete an article about "Sugarcane"? Was it some sort of vandalism or was it a correct article? I would like to know because I wanted to find out what a Sugarcane is and I couln't find the article. Thanks in advance for your answer: ) -Woodchuck 10:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'd like to know that as well - sugarcane both exists and it's notable. Of course, you may be a sugar beet fan and are merely jealous of sugarcane. ;) Peter1968 10:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- I assume you meant to selectively restore and got sidetracked or something. I've gone ahead and restored the last good version. -- Rick Block (talk) 13:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- There was a telephon number which I removed. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:12, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Interwiki Probleme mit de
Bekommst Du die Interwiki Problematik auf dewiki zur Zeit mit? Agathoclea 20:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Huch! Wer, wie, wo? Hab momentan allgemein wenig Zeit, mir v. a. de:wp anzugucken. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Die Situation entwikelt sich nach einigen Wochen Vandalismus jetzt in eine etwas konstruktivere Diskussion Agathoclea 21:40, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 67.82.75.219
I see that you blocked 67.82.75.219 for 24 hours about two weeks ago. He has continued vandalizing Wikipedia. I see no reason why he shouldn't be blocked for a longer period of time. Thanks, Rm999 05:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- My first block is always for 24 hours. Please report perpetuating vandals to WP:AIV. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Talk:Mars global warming
There was a contentious forced merge of Mars global warming into Climate of Mars. The talk page Talk:Mars global warming was left alone at the time but I suspect that someone came along and changed it to a redirect and you, just seeing the redirect, deleted it. Could you restore the page and revert back to the version prior to it becoming a redirect? I'm going to be doing something with that page and would like the old talk restored. TMLutas 07:33, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- The page had just one version—the redirect. Its namespace 0 page is a redirect, too, and the talk page is orphaned. There is—in my opinion—no reason to restore this redirect. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:32, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- There's something odd going on. I remember personally contributing to this page so you should have more of a history than just a redirect. Is Wikipedia losing some of its history? I thought it kept everything. Could you double check that there's not anything underneath that redirect? TMLutas 18:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- The page has been moved to Talk:Martian global warming. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. You may want to put this sort of check as part of your standard routine. This page is very controversial as it impacts on the viability of alternate explanations of terrestrial global warming. TMLutas 01:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- The page has been moved to Talk:Martian global warming. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- There's something odd going on. I remember personally contributing to this page so you should have more of a history than just a redirect. Is Wikipedia losing some of its history? I thought it kept everything. Could you double check that there's not anything underneath that redirect? TMLutas 18:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Possible sockpuppet?
Hey DerHexer, I was just wondering if you have any view on this IP user, who has full knowledge of WP:NPA and seems to have the knowledge of a long established user. This is very strange for an IP user, who has an immediate knowledge of Wikipedia, and I was wondering if I could get your view on this. Thanks, — jacĸrм (talk) 19:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Norway, hmm. I know of no users who would use an IP to get around things from Norway. Thanks, — jacĸrм (talk) 20:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks #4
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page:). JimboV1 23:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Great work
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
| Good job deleting all those unnecessary pages and reverting much vandalism! For that, I, Midorihana, award you the Working Wikipedian's Barnstar.Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 08:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Thank you
 |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| Most of time, when i try to revert article because of vandalism, you've already done it. Real speedy Gonzales. Keep up the wonderful work! --Ilyushka88 19:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] about Unicef page
why did you remove the link Visit this page daily to generate a donation to Unicef to help children??? It's not spam! But the link lifesite.net is curious... You should read twice before removing! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.115.127.28 (talk) 11:03, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Of course it's spam. Btw., the link is wrong. You've doubled the http://. —DerHexer (Talk) 11:13, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
It's hard for me to understand how it could be spam since it's a link to help unicef on the unicef page!... Also, why do you conserve the link http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/oct/04101201.html ?? It's not a unicef site! Read that page http://www.lifesite.net/aboutlifesite/ and tell me if it's not spam!! You're not neutral! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.115.127.28 (talk) 16:05, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, it might be spam, too. I've not seen that page but your spamming on many, many projects so that I've removed your spam link. If you remove the other one I would not revert it. … But I will not take the trouble to inspect every page if it is spam or not. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:38, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Admin tools
Could you come onto IRC for a bit to discuss the admin script? Regards, —Animum (etc.) 19:05, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Where?
Don't mean to sound nosey, but what server and channel on IRC do you all hang around at? :P — jacĸrм (talk) 21:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- #wikipedia, #wikipedia-en, #wikipedia-en-admins, #wikipedia-es, #wikipedia-de, #wikipedia-admin, #wikipedia-de-chem, #wikipedia-de-rc, #wikimedia-swmt, #wikimedia-stewards and sometimes #wikimedia. Why do you ask me? —DerHexer (Talk) 21:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- What server is that at? I was just wondering as I used to go there, but now I've lost the server and my connection is currently being slow, therefore trying to find the server through Wikipedia is not such a good idea. — jacĸrм (talk) 22:00, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- meta:IRC channels? ;) It's freenode. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- What server is that at? I was just wondering as I used to go there, but now I've lost the server and my connection is currently being slow, therefore trying to find the server through Wikipedia is not such a good idea. — jacĸrм (talk) 22:00, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Stop
Vulture Bay is my friend. I deleted the SPAM, however now you are deleting what was there from earlier. Xeysz ☼ 22:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Halbsperren
Kannst du mir mal bitte meine Benutzerseite und Diskussionsseite halbsperren? Ich habe genug von dem Penner. Marcus Cyron 22:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Benutzerseite unbegrenzt halbgesperrt, Diskussionsseite für einen Tag. Kennst ja die Regeln ;) , —DerHexer (Talk) 22:16, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Der nervt aber schon länger. Eine Woche wäre schon nett. Ansonsten trotzdem danke. Marcus Cyron 22:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ich nehm deine Benutzerseite auf meine Beobachtungsliste und werde beim wiederholten Vandalieren radikaler eingreifen. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 23:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Merci. Du darfst dir deine Belohnung an der Bar abholen ;). Marcus Cyron 10:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Mach ich aber nur, wenn du nicht weiter über Herodot herziehst. Ein toller Autor und ein tolles Buch, wenn man Kommentierungen und die z.&nsbp;T. nötigen Richtigstellungen hat. Aber für die Bücher 2 (Ägypten) und 4 (Skythen) hatte er ja größtenteils sehr gut informierte Fremdenführer bzw. Übersetzer. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ich liebe Herodot - dennoch bin ich kritisch. Marcus Cyron 12:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- Mach ich aber nur, wenn du nicht weiter über Herodot herziehst. Ein toller Autor und ein tolles Buch, wenn man Kommentierungen und die z.&nsbp;T. nötigen Richtigstellungen hat. Aber für die Bücher 2 (Ägypten) und 4 (Skythen) hatte er ja größtenteils sehr gut informierte Fremdenführer bzw. Übersetzer. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Merci. Du darfst dir deine Belohnung an der Bar abholen ;). Marcus Cyron 10:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ich nehm deine Benutzerseite auf meine Beobachtungsliste und werde beim wiederholten Vandalieren radikaler eingreifen. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 23:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Der nervt aber schon länger. Eine Woche wäre schon nett. Ansonsten trotzdem danke. Marcus Cyron 22:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. The sunder king 22:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- This is a discussion page. Here I can use the language I want to use. It's not your problem. I don't like it, if somone will tell me, wich language I have to use. And a translation is not needed. Please do your own things. Marcus Cyron 22:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it's not the first time that I get this message. … Marcus asked me to protect his user (talk) page. And I've done that. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- I watchlisted as well. Agathoclea 21:35, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it's not the first time that I get this message. … Marcus asked me to protect his user (talk) page. And I've done that. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Revert on Alcoholics Anonymous
Hi,
User 207.232.97.13
has been vandalizing the AA article for months now, my deletion of his material was in line with the discussion page. Thanks. 80.194.237.22 23:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Block of
Did you get confused? :P [9], [10]. Heh, anyhow, keep up the great work, and happy vandal whacking. Oh and btw did you know you've beaten the IRC revert bot the most times? That's no small feat! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 00:03, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I've known that. But it's not important who reverts but that it will be reverted. … Thanks for your fix. Maybe there is a bug in my script—I'll try to fix it. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 00:04, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- Anytime, just keep up the stupendous work! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 00:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Quick help
user:68.121.25.73 needs blocking, please, and perhaps his two favorite pages need to be semi-ed. He's a sock that just keeps coming back... I've reported to AIV but no one is watching it. Thanks! Gscshoyru 21:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Specialists Revert
TSRP is not acceptable in the Wikipedia article. The role-play bastardization of the game is as unique to TS as it is to Counter-Strike, Half-life (even more so: see Master Sword Continued), Magic the Gathering, or checkers. Aside from TSRP being third-party and built off of mostly illegally pirated content, it simply is nothing more than advertising here. Keep in-game community information on your respective forums, and not flooding half the official Wikipedia article.
This has been posted in the page discussion. It is unreasonable and a legal risk to relate what appears to be official 'The Specialists Mod' information with a single players' role-play addon which is responsible for large-scale distribution illegal/pirate content. Infact, the entire section of role-play is officially unsupported and officially discouraged. Do not revert the removal of 'Role-Play.' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.164.0.240 (talk) 21:55, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks! #2
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Nburden (T) 22:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] You blocked a user
You blocked User:Qomee for being a vandalism only account. While it was definitely true that all 2 of the user's edits were vandalism, the user had not yet been warned or otherwise notified of wikipedia's policies. Wouldn't a {{blatantvandal}} been a better action immediately? I know vandals get us all down and waste significant amounts of all our time, but banning straight out of the gate seems like it would discourage the rare repentant vandal from contributing meaningfully. I'm not asking you to unban this particular user, just... try not to bite the newbies quite so hard(even the vandals) i kan reed 03:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- (responding for him) See Wikipedia:Long_term_abuse#Genesis_vandal. Gscshoyru 03:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My Rfa
Thanks for voting in my Rfa, which I withdrew from yesterday. Though I did not get promoted, I see this Rfa as being a success nonetheless. What I got out of this Rfa will help me to be a better, all around editor. Because of this Rfa I have decided to become better in other areas of editing. I'm not going to just be a vandalfighter. Though vandalfighting is good, being active in all areas of editing is even better. Have a nice day.--SJP 22:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Gosh!
You just beat me to not 1, not 2, not 3, but 10, that's 10 reverts in a row. This is almost annoying ;). Thanks for being so awesome. :) Nihiltres(t.l) 22:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My recent RfA #2
Thank you for participating in my recent RfA. Although the voting ended at 36/22/5, there was no consensus to promote, and the RfA was unsuccessful. I would like the thank you nonetheless for supporting me during the RfA, and hope that any future RfA’s proceed better than this one did. Again, I thank you for your support. ≈ The Haunted Angel Review Me! 02:24, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar #2 (NHRHS2010 --> DerHexer)
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. NHRHS2010 talk 21:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC) |
