User talk:DepartedUser

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See [1] for speedy rationale. Hipocrite - «Talk» 18:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Are you sure you want this? This will involve blocking this account indefinitely. Please confirm and it will be done. I will make a note in the block log that you are closing the account which means you won't run into a violation of WP:SOCK. --Yamla 18:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I am certain. Hipocrite - «Talk» 18:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Do not block this account untill I have done the AWB run to disappear my signature, however. Hipocrite - «Talk» 18:06, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Okay, please remove your request to change your username. Once you have done this, I will delete the account. I'm about to break for lunch so it may not happen immediately, but should be fairly soon. Replace the db-user when you are ready. --Yamla 18:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] TOR proxies

Your user page states incorrectly that there is no policy which says TOR proxies should be blocked. In fact, the policy WP:PROXY. --Yamla 18:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

WP:PROXY is not policy as it lacks community consensus and is not mandated by the foundation. Hipocrite - «Talk» 18:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


Hi dude, I don't know you but I saw a post of yours. Some advice, CheckUser only lasts as long as recent changes. This used to be 30 days but right now it looks like it's 12. See [2]. So it's only a brief wait. Joshua Zelinsky 21:43, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:ShapeWrapIIblg.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ShapeWrapIIblg.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 22:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SSP page - Sir Issac Brock

To remove such information you need to go to Requests for oversight, not speedy deletion. Thanks, ELIMINATORJR TALK 19:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

I am aware and have done that. Please do not unblank the page, which is already being used to harass me. Thank you. Hipocrite - «Talk» 19:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars

I've nominated Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars, a page you created, for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. IPSOS (talk) 22:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Take Care

All the best. Steve block Talk 21:10, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of First Family of the United States

An article that you have been involved in editing, First Family of the United States, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Family of the United States (2nd nomination). Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 05:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:She Wants Revenge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:She Wants Revenge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hawthorne Heights - If only you where lonely - 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hawthorne Heights - If only you where lonely - 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HawthorneHeights.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HawthorneHeights.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lyndale logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lyndale logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Prussian Blue (duo)

An editor has nominated Prussian Blue (duo), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prussian Blue (duo) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)