Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||||||
Argued November 5, 2007 Decided May 19, 2008 |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Holding | ||||||||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||||||||
Chief Justice: John Glover Roberts, Jr. Associate Justices: John Paul Stevens, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito |
||||||||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||||||||
Plurality by: Souter (opinion of the Court except for Part III-B) Joined by: Stevens, Breyer; Roberts, Ginsburg (all but Part III-B); Scalia (all but Parts III-B and IV) Concurrence by: Roberts Concurrence by: Stevens Concurrence by: Scalia Concurrence by: Thomas Dissent by: Kennedy Joined by: Alito Dissent by: Alito |
Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis, 553 U.S. ___ (2008) is a decision, in a 7-2 vote, by the Supreme Court of the United States which upheld a Kentucky law that provides a preferential tax break to Kentucky residents who invest in bonds issued by the state and its municipalities (municipal bonds). The Court held that the State of Kentucky does not engage in unconstitutional discrimination against interstate commerce by exempting the interest on its bonds from residents’ taxable income while taxing the interest earned on the bonds of other states.[1]
The case has national implications because thirty-six (36) states have tax schemes similar to the one at issue in Kentucky.[2]
Contents |
[edit] Background
George and Catherine Davis sued the State of Kentucky under the legal theory that the State of Kentucky violated the Dormant Commerce Clause, a legal implication of the Commerce Clause, by providing a differential tax treatment to gains earned from investments in municipal bonds from Kentucky versus other states.[3]
[edit] See also
[edit] Notes
[edit] External links
- Supreme Court Decision - Slip Opinion