User talk:Denzelio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] PlayStation Blog
You seem to be against the idea of using the PlayStation Blog as a reference on the PlayStation 3 System Software page, am I misreading your edits? If not, why should this source not be used? john.n-irl (talk) 18:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Like the other refs for the other updates, the one i listed is direct to the point of what is included in the update and is in point form, and can't be any more official then an update log. It also follows the other primary refs used for the other updates. Anyway the blog isn't structured like an update log, contains POV and is not an official update log (by Sony), so if it was an update log from Sony EU,AU or U.S. I'd have no problem with it. I think of these update logs as a primary ref for these updates as they are the easiest to read and directly from Sony, not from 'Google searches' or blogs..' as such, So once the official update log is released it naturally overwrites any ref that isn't properly structured as an update log. anyway as to the comment about other sites listed like kotaku they also serve a purpose (as a secondary ref) as the primary refs (update logs) explain the bulk and primary functions of an update but, other users find more things that were added that still make a difference and should be known, while i have no argument of these being listed along side the official updates notations - naturally the primary update log should always be mentioned. Denzelio (talk) 18:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not going to enter the fray on this, but I do need to let you know that the PlayStation Blog is an official blog by SCEA and what is said there is a primary source and may be treated as such. Thingg⊕⊗ 18:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- I don't mind the PlayStation.Blog being used as a ref however like the other refs once the official updatelog comes out, the way it's displayed is easiest to read and usually tells you what the new features do if not displaying a picture at times, so basically i just see these refs when being released as superseding a (less structured) blog-ref so to speak.Denzelio (talk) 22:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not going to enter the fray on this, but I do need to let you know that the PlayStation Blog is an official blog by SCEA and what is said there is a primary source and may be treated as such. Thingg⊕⊗ 18:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 2.20
Is there a source for the update info you just added to the main page? I know some of it was announced, but wasnt some "rumour"? John.n-irl (talk) 03:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- I had about 3 refs on the discussion page for 2.20, basically the different sites used and recycled information from an official Sony 2.20 press release(not the final version) and from Sony.blog. Anyway like usual just waiting for the official Update log, should be soon.
- Lost that when copying it over, my mistake. John.n-irl (talk) 03:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- I think the way you've got the layout for 2.20 is pretty much spot on :) thanks. its technically media but the rest is correct :) it does make it easier to read each change and how it effects the system, thats why I grouped the changes all that time ago lol :) Chocobogamer (talk) 11:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
-
[edit] My third topic :)
Updates should not need to be labelled as unreleased, this is clear from its release date. I have renamed the column as Release date to reflect that 2.3 is not yet available. John.n-irl (talk) 02:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
