User talk:Denton22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] World of Warcraft revert

Hi! I believe there is considerable consensus that extremely detailed information (such as the class info I reverted) is inappropriate in a Wikipedia article. Have a read of the section "Who wants more content? (Leave your name here)" in Talk:World of Warcraft. --Stormie (talk) 07:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

RF Online

[edit] Warhammer Online logo on World of Warcraft

A-ha! Caught-cha! Entertaining, but really shouldn't be doing that, though I have a feeling you already know. Casull 06:56, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Ohhhh okay, suuuuuuuuure. :D Casull 07:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Casull (talkcontribs)
For reals though.Denton22 (talk) 07:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BurstLimitScreen.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BurstLimitScreen.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)