User talk:Dennbergstraße

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Dennbergstraße (talk • contribs • block logauto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "EineNeueSchuhe". The reason given for EineNeueSchuhe's block is: "Sock puppet of banned user: This user has been blocked indefinitely because the user is a sock puppet of Ichträgtkeineschuhe. Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.".

  • Decline reason:

I find it highly likely that this is also a sockpuppet. — John Reaves (talk) 21:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Likelyhood does not entail proof or even reasonable evidence. You have blocked me for no better reason than gut feelings, a form of profiling, and a breach of the Wikipedia rules which Jimbo Wales would NOT approve of. I did not even get to make but ONE contribution. Would you please unblock me so that I can take my place as a productive member of Wikipedia?"

Decline reason: "The autoblock tells us everything we need to know. – Luna Santin (talk) 17:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

The duck test is not at all against the rules. In fact, it's right in them. Sorry. If you want to request a checkuser, feel free, but I have a feeling you might neglect to do so. Part Deux 17:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Likelyhood does not entail proof or even reasonable evidence. You have blocked me for no better reason than gut feelings, a form of profiling, and a breach of the Wikipedia rules which Jimbo Wales would NOT approve of. I did not even get to make but ONE contribution. Would you please unblock me so that I can take my place as a productive member of Wikipedia?"

Decline reason: "See Lindstraße (talk · contribs). — Sandstein 17:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Go away, Ichträgtkeineschuhe.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 00:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)